A hybrid CNN–RNN model for rainfall–runoff modeling in the Potteruvagu watershed of India

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Padala Raja Shekar, Aneesh Mathew, Kul Vaibhav Sharma
{"title":"A hybrid CNN–RNN model for rainfall–runoff modeling in the Potteruvagu watershed of India","authors":"Padala Raja Shekar,&nbsp;Aneesh Mathew,&nbsp;Kul Vaibhav Sharma","doi":"10.1002/clen.202300341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate rainfall-runoff analysis is essential for water resource management, with artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly used in this and other hydrological areas. The need for precise modelling has driven substantial advancements in recent decades. This study employed six AI models. These were the support vector regression model (SVR), the multilinear regression model (MLR), the extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost), the long-short-term memory (LSTM) model, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model, and the convolutional recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN) hybrid model. It covered 1998–2006, with 1998–2004 for calibration/training and 2005–2006 for validation/testing. Five metrics were used to measure model performance: coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root-mean square error (RMSE), and RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR). The hybrid CNN-RNN model performed best in both training and testing periods (training: R<sup>2</sup> is 0.92, NSE is 0.91, MAE is 10.37 m<sup>3</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, RMSE is 13.13 m<sup>3</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, and RSR is 0.30; testing: R<sup>2</sup> is 0.95, NSE is 0.94, MAE is 12.18 m<sup>3</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, RMSE is 15.86 m<sup>3</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, and RSR is 0.25). These results suggest the hybrid CNN-RNN model is highly effective for rainfall-runoff analysis in the Potteruvagu watershed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.202300341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate rainfall-runoff analysis is essential for water resource management, with artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly used in this and other hydrological areas. The need for precise modelling has driven substantial advancements in recent decades. This study employed six AI models. These were the support vector regression model (SVR), the multilinear regression model (MLR), the extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost), the long-short-term memory (LSTM) model, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model, and the convolutional recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN) hybrid model. It covered 1998–2006, with 1998–2004 for calibration/training and 2005–2006 for validation/testing. Five metrics were used to measure model performance: coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root-mean square error (RMSE), and RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR). The hybrid CNN-RNN model performed best in both training and testing periods (training: R2 is 0.92, NSE is 0.91, MAE is 10.37 m3s−1, RMSE is 13.13 m3s−1, and RSR is 0.30; testing: R2 is 0.95, NSE is 0.94, MAE is 12.18 m3s−1, RMSE is 15.86 m3s−1, and RSR is 0.25). These results suggest the hybrid CNN-RNN model is highly effective for rainfall-runoff analysis in the Potteruvagu watershed.

印度Potteruvagu流域降雨径流模拟的CNN-RNN混合模型
随着人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于这一和其他水文领域,准确的降雨径流分析对水资源管理至关重要。近几十年来,对精确建模的需求推动了重大进步。本研究采用了6个人工智能模型。分别是支持向量回归模型(SVR)、多元线性回归模型(MLR)、极端梯度增强模型(XGBoost)、长短期记忆模型(LSTM)、卷积神经网络(CNN)模型和卷积递归神经网络(CNN- rnn)混合模型。它涵盖1998-2006年,其中1998-2004年为校准/培训,2005-2006年为验证/测试。采用5个指标衡量模型性能:决定系数(R2)、纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和RMSE-观测值标准差比(RSR)。CNN-RNN混合模型在训练期和测试期均表现最佳(训练期:R2为0.92,NSE为0.91,MAE为10.37 m3 - 1, RMSE为13.13 m3 - 1, RSR为0.30;检验:R2为0.95,NSE为0.94,MAE为12.18 m3 - 1, RMSE为15.86 m3 - 1, RSR为0.25)。这些结果表明,CNN-RNN混合模型对Potteruvagu流域的降雨径流分析是非常有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信