Integrative computational pipeline for identifying binding-enhancing mutations targeting the MBD2–p66α interaction: Implications for therapeutic applications

IF 1.7 4区 化学
Sargol Mazraedoost, Hadi Sedigh Malekroodi, Myunggi Yi, J. Jay Liu, Sung In Lim
{"title":"Integrative computational pipeline for identifying binding-enhancing mutations targeting the MBD2–p66α interaction: Implications for therapeutic applications","authors":"Sargol Mazraedoost,&nbsp;Hadi Sedigh Malekroodi,&nbsp;Myunggi Yi,&nbsp;J. Jay Liu,&nbsp;Sung In Lim","doi":"10.1002/bkcs.12923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a comprehensive computational pipeline to identify and evaluate potential stabilizing mutations for the coiled-coil protein–protein interaction between methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 (MBD2) and transcriptional repressor p66-alpha (p66α). The pipeline begins with the BeAtMuSiC program, which employs statistical potentials derived from known structures to predict candidate stabilizing mutations at the protein–protein interface. Out of 565 potential mutations, 10 single-point mutations (K149I, K163I, A237F, K149L, K149M, K163L, R166M, R166W, K163F, and E155L) with the highest binding affinity were selected for further evaluation using rigorous alchemical free energy calculations. These alchemical simulations conducted using the double-system/single-box method, predicted changes in binding free energy (ΔΔ<i>G</i>) upon mutation while maintaining charge neutrality. The Crooks–Gaussian intersection technique was employed to analyze the results, identifying K149I, K149L, and K163L as potentially enhancing binding affinity the most, while mutations like K163F, A237F, and E155L were predicted to destabilize the interaction significantly. Complementary conventional Molecular Dynamics Simulations provided further support for the alchemical predictions, revealing decreased flexibility, increased contacts, and more compact structures for the predicted stabilizing mutants compared with the wild-type complex. Additionally, Molecular Mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) binding free energy calculations were performed, and their results were consistent with the direction of free energy change predicted by the alchemical approach. This multifaceted computational pipeline, combining predictive methods, alchemical simulations, and conventional analyses, offers valuable insights into modulating the binding affinity of the MBD2–p66α coiled-coil interaction. The identified stabilizing mutations can create numerous opportunities across biotechnology, biomedical research, and synthetic biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54252,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society","volume":"46 1","pages":"57-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bkcs.12923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive computational pipeline to identify and evaluate potential stabilizing mutations for the coiled-coil protein–protein interaction between methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 (MBD2) and transcriptional repressor p66-alpha (p66α). The pipeline begins with the BeAtMuSiC program, which employs statistical potentials derived from known structures to predict candidate stabilizing mutations at the protein–protein interface. Out of 565 potential mutations, 10 single-point mutations (K149I, K163I, A237F, K149L, K149M, K163L, R166M, R166W, K163F, and E155L) with the highest binding affinity were selected for further evaluation using rigorous alchemical free energy calculations. These alchemical simulations conducted using the double-system/single-box method, predicted changes in binding free energy (ΔΔG) upon mutation while maintaining charge neutrality. The Crooks–Gaussian intersection technique was employed to analyze the results, identifying K149I, K149L, and K163L as potentially enhancing binding affinity the most, while mutations like K163F, A237F, and E155L were predicted to destabilize the interaction significantly. Complementary conventional Molecular Dynamics Simulations provided further support for the alchemical predictions, revealing decreased flexibility, increased contacts, and more compact structures for the predicted stabilizing mutants compared with the wild-type complex. Additionally, Molecular Mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) binding free energy calculations were performed, and their results were consistent with the direction of free energy change predicted by the alchemical approach. This multifaceted computational pipeline, combining predictive methods, alchemical simulations, and conventional analyses, offers valuable insights into modulating the binding affinity of the MBD2–p66α coiled-coil interaction. The identified stabilizing mutations can create numerous opportunities across biotechnology, biomedical research, and synthetic biology.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society Chemistry-General Chemistry
自引率
23.50%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society is an official research journal of the Korean Chemical Society. It was founded in 1980 and reaches out to the chemical community worldwide. It is strictly peer-reviewed and welcomes Accounts, Communications, Articles, and Notes written in English. The scope of the journal covers all major areas of chemistry: analytical chemistry, electrochemistry, industrial chemistry, inorganic chemistry, life-science chemistry, macromolecular chemistry, organic synthesis, non-synthetic organic chemistry, physical chemistry, and materials chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信