Reaching for Excellence Through Equity or Prestige? US Private Master's Comprehensive Institutions and Low-Income Students

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jarrett B. Warshaw, Matt DeMonbrun, Jon McNaughtan
{"title":"Reaching for Excellence Through Equity or Prestige? US Private Master's Comprehensive Institutions and Low-Income Students","authors":"Jarrett B. Warshaw,&nbsp;Matt DeMonbrun,&nbsp;Jon McNaughtan","doi":"10.1111/hequ.12573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Private master's comprehensive institutions (PMCIs) in the United States navigate pressures to expand college access and equity while striving for prestige in the academic hierarchy. To strive for prestige entails competing for world-class status of greater selectivity, research intensity and resources, but such a pathway to excellence may, because of market-competition, deepen institutional and student stratification in the sector. In this study, we examine how organisational characteristics associated with striving influence low-income student enrolment at PMCIs over time. Our panel analysis revealed selected factors constraining the enrolment of low-income students at the average PMCI. But the magnitude of these statistical relationships was rather modest and did not suggest dramatically worsening institutional and student inequality in the sector. These findings support a flexible theory of organisational fields, illuminating more equity-centred behaviours at the typical PMCI than what prior literature indicates. We discuss implications for research and policy emphasising equity's connection to institutional excellence.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.12573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Private master's comprehensive institutions (PMCIs) in the United States navigate pressures to expand college access and equity while striving for prestige in the academic hierarchy. To strive for prestige entails competing for world-class status of greater selectivity, research intensity and resources, but such a pathway to excellence may, because of market-competition, deepen institutional and student stratification in the sector. In this study, we examine how organisational characteristics associated with striving influence low-income student enrolment at PMCIs over time. Our panel analysis revealed selected factors constraining the enrolment of low-income students at the average PMCI. But the magnitude of these statistical relationships was rather modest and did not suggest dramatically worsening institutional and student inequality in the sector. These findings support a flexible theory of organisational fields, illuminating more equity-centred behaviours at the typical PMCI than what prior literature indicates. We discuss implications for research and policy emphasising equity's connection to institutional excellence.

通过公平还是声望追求卓越?美国私立硕士综合机构和低收入学生
美国的私立综合硕士院校(PMCIs)在努力争取学术地位的同时,也承受着扩大大学入学机会和公平的压力。要想获得声望,就必须竞争更有选择性、研究强度和资源的世界级地位,但由于市场竞争,这种通往卓越的途径可能会加深该领域的机构和学生分层。在本研究中,我们研究了与努力相关的组织特征如何随着时间的推移影响PMCIs低收入学生的入学率。我们的小组分析揭示了在平均PMCI中限制低收入学生入学的选定因素。但这些统计关系的规模相当有限,并不表明该行业的制度和学生不平等现象急剧恶化。这些发现支持了一种灵活的组织领域理论,阐明了典型PMCI中比以往文献所表明的更多以公平为中心的行为。我们讨论了对研究和政策的影响,强调公平与制度卓越的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信