“Privacy Is a Privilege”: A Thematic Analysis of the Concerns and Advice of Canadians Crowdfunding for Basic Living Needs

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS
Ashmita Grewal, Jeremy Snyder, Valorie Crooks
{"title":"“Privacy Is a Privilege”: A Thematic Analysis of the Concerns and Advice of Canadians Crowdfunding for Basic Living Needs","authors":"Ashmita Grewal,&nbsp;Jeremy Snyder,&nbsp;Valorie Crooks","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crowdfunding campaigners can struggle with protecting their personal information while providing a compelling case for why their campaign is worthy of support. Little research has examined donation-based crowdfunding campaigners' experience of protecting their sensitive health-related information while trying to meet their fundraising goals. Our research uses semi-structured interviews to explore the concerns of donation-based crowdfunding campaigners who are raising funding for health and/or housing-related reasons, which can be considered basic-living needs. Participants were primarily recruited through two methods: identifying potential participants through a database of scraped crowdfunding campaigns and posting calls for participants on Twitter, Craigslist, and Reddit. We interviewed 24 participants from Canada. All participants were above the age of 19 and crowdfunded for their own health and/or housing-related needs. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify broad domains that encapsulate participants' privacy concerns and the advice they have for others related to privacy protection. Participants identified three areas of privacy-related concerns arising from their experience of creating a crowdfunding campaign for themselves: (1) the public nature of crowdfunding campaigns and related harms; (2) being messaged or intrusively probed by potential donors; and (3) the information collection and sharing by platforms. Based on their experiences of crowdfunding, participants recommended people considering starting a crowdfunding campaign to be both cautious and specific; be informed; and consider the uncertainties related to the practice of crowdfunding. Our analysis indicates campaigners are often unaware of the significant pressures they will face to give up their privacy in exchange for financial support. Participants' privacy-related concerns are complex and intertwined. Better intervention from crowdfunding platforms and government policymakers can help better inform and protect these campaigners.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nvsm.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crowdfunding campaigners can struggle with protecting their personal information while providing a compelling case for why their campaign is worthy of support. Little research has examined donation-based crowdfunding campaigners' experience of protecting their sensitive health-related information while trying to meet their fundraising goals. Our research uses semi-structured interviews to explore the concerns of donation-based crowdfunding campaigners who are raising funding for health and/or housing-related reasons, which can be considered basic-living needs. Participants were primarily recruited through two methods: identifying potential participants through a database of scraped crowdfunding campaigns and posting calls for participants on Twitter, Craigslist, and Reddit. We interviewed 24 participants from Canada. All participants were above the age of 19 and crowdfunded for their own health and/or housing-related needs. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify broad domains that encapsulate participants' privacy concerns and the advice they have for others related to privacy protection. Participants identified three areas of privacy-related concerns arising from their experience of creating a crowdfunding campaign for themselves: (1) the public nature of crowdfunding campaigns and related harms; (2) being messaged or intrusively probed by potential donors; and (3) the information collection and sharing by platforms. Based on their experiences of crowdfunding, participants recommended people considering starting a crowdfunding campaign to be both cautious and specific; be informed; and consider the uncertainties related to the practice of crowdfunding. Our analysis indicates campaigners are often unaware of the significant pressures they will face to give up their privacy in exchange for financial support. Participants' privacy-related concerns are complex and intertwined. Better intervention from crowdfunding platforms and government policymakers can help better inform and protect these campaigners.

“隐私是一种特权”:对加拿大基本生活需求众筹的关注与建议的专题分析
众筹竞选者在提供一个令人信服的理由来说明为什么他们的活动值得支持的同时,可以努力保护他们的个人信息。很少有研究调查以捐赠为基础的众筹活动人士在努力实现筹款目标的同时保护他们敏感的健康相关信息的经历。我们的研究使用半结构化访谈来探讨基于捐赠的众筹活动人士的担忧,他们为健康和/或住房相关的原因筹集资金,这些原因可以被视为基本生活需求。参与者主要通过两种方法招募:通过收集的众筹活动数据库识别潜在参与者,以及在Twitter、Craigslist和Reddit上发布招募参与者的公告。我们采访了24位来自加拿大的参与者。所有参与者都在19岁以上,并为自己的健康和/或住房相关需求进行众筹。进行了专题分析,以确定概括了参与者对隐私问题的关注以及他们对与隐私保护有关的其他人的建议的广泛领域。参与者从他们自己的众筹活动中发现了三个与隐私相关的问题:(1)众筹活动的公共性和相关危害;(2)受到潜在捐赠者的短信或侵入性调查;(3)平台的信息收集与共享。根据他们的众筹经验,与会者建议考虑发起众筹活动的人要谨慎和具体;被告知;再考虑一下与众筹实践相关的不确定性。我们的分析表明,活动人士往往没有意识到他们将面临的巨大压力,即放弃自己的隐私以换取经济支持。参与者对隐私的担忧是复杂而相互交织的。众筹平台和政府决策者的更好干预可以帮助更好地告知和保护这些活动家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信