Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen after 34 years under conventional and organic management practices at the Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial

Klaus Lorenz, Emmanuel Omondi, Rattan Lal, Saurav Das, Andrew Smith
{"title":"Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen after 34 years under conventional and organic management practices at the Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial","authors":"Klaus Lorenz,&nbsp;Emmanuel Omondi,&nbsp;Rattan Lal,&nbsp;Saurav Das,&nbsp;Andrew Smith","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Long-term agricultural experiments are uniquely positioned to capture the spatiotemporal dynamics of farming system effects on soil profile properties, which typically require decades for measurable changes to become apparent. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations and stocks were determined at a depth of 0–30 cm in the 34th year of the Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial (FST), Kutztown, Pennsylvania, USA. Only the organic agriculture (OA) with manure (OA-MNR) system plots had higher SOC concentrations and stocks than the plots of the other systems but only at depths of 0–10 and 10–20 cm, and not on equivalent soil mass (ESM) basis to 30-cm depth. The ESM SOC stocks to 30-cm depth at the tilled plots were 53.3, 56.2, and 61.9 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for conventional (CONV), OA-legume (OA-LEG), and OA-MNR systems, respectively. The concentrations and stocks of TN, as well as ESM TN stocks to 30-cm depth at the tilled plots, were higher for both OA systems compared to CONV. However, observations at the recently established reduced tillage (RT) subplots were inconsistent, as at least 10 years may be needed to ensure that differences in tillage treatment effects on SOC can be detected. The results are consistent with many other long-term field experiments that have reported differences in SOC and TN concentrations and stocks only in the topsoil. Overall, the OA-MNR system was advantageous in 2015 in increasing SOC and TN compared to the CONV and OA-LEG systems. Thus, OA practices when combined with composted manure addition can result in increases in the SOC stock in the long term. However, subsequent studies should assess the implications for input of manure sourced from outside the OA-MNR system. Further, soil samples should be taken several times over multiple years to more comprehensively assess management-induced changes in soil properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term agricultural experiments are uniquely positioned to capture the spatiotemporal dynamics of farming system effects on soil profile properties, which typically require decades for measurable changes to become apparent. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations and stocks were determined at a depth of 0–30 cm in the 34th year of the Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial (FST), Kutztown, Pennsylvania, USA. Only the organic agriculture (OA) with manure (OA-MNR) system plots had higher SOC concentrations and stocks than the plots of the other systems but only at depths of 0–10 and 10–20 cm, and not on equivalent soil mass (ESM) basis to 30-cm depth. The ESM SOC stocks to 30-cm depth at the tilled plots were 53.3, 56.2, and 61.9 Mg C ha−1 for conventional (CONV), OA-legume (OA-LEG), and OA-MNR systems, respectively. The concentrations and stocks of TN, as well as ESM TN stocks to 30-cm depth at the tilled plots, were higher for both OA systems compared to CONV. However, observations at the recently established reduced tillage (RT) subplots were inconsistent, as at least 10 years may be needed to ensure that differences in tillage treatment effects on SOC can be detected. The results are consistent with many other long-term field experiments that have reported differences in SOC and TN concentrations and stocks only in the topsoil. Overall, the OA-MNR system was advantageous in 2015 in increasing SOC and TN compared to the CONV and OA-LEG systems. Thus, OA practices when combined with composted manure addition can result in increases in the SOC stock in the long term. However, subsequent studies should assess the implications for input of manure sourced from outside the OA-MNR system. Further, soil samples should be taken several times over multiple years to more comprehensively assess management-induced changes in soil properties.

在Rodale研究所农业系统试验中,经过34年传统和有机管理实践后的土壤有机碳和总氮
长期农业试验在捕捉耕作制度对土壤剖面特性影响的时空动态方面具有得天独厚的优势,而这种影响通常需要几十年的时间才能显现出可测量的变化。在美国宾夕法尼亚州库兹镇罗代尔研究所耕作制度试验(FST)的第 34 个年头,测定了 0-30 厘米深度的土壤有机碳(SOC)和全氮(TN)浓度和储量。只有有机农业(OA)加粪肥(OA-MNR)系统地块的 SOC 浓度和储量高于其他系统地块,但仅限于 0-10 厘米和 10-20 厘米深度,而不是 30 厘米深度的等效土壤质量(ESM)。常规(CONV)、OA-豆科(OA-LEG)和 OA-MNR 系统翻耕地块 30 厘米深的等效土壤质量(ESM)SOC 储量分别为 53.3、56.2 和 61.9 兆克 C ha-1。与CONV相比,两种OA系统的TN浓度和存量以及翻耕地块30厘米深处的ESM TN存量都更高。然而,对最近建立的减少耕作(RT)子地块的观测结果并不一致,因为可能需要至少 10 年的时间才能确保检测到耕作处理对 SOC 影响的差异。这些结果与许多其他长期田间试验的结果一致,这些试验仅报告了表层土壤中 SOC 和 TN 浓度和存量的差异。总体而言,与 CONV 和 OA-LEG 系统相比,2015 年的 OA-MNR 系统在增加 SOC 和 TN 方面更具优势。因此,OA 实践与堆肥添加相结合,可长期增加 SOC 储量。不过,后续研究应评估从 OA-MNR 系统外输入粪肥的影响。此外,应在多年内多次采集土壤样本,以更全面地评估管理引起的土壤性质变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信