Compost Application Enhances Soil Health and Maintains Crop Yield: Insights From 56 Farmer-Managed Arable Fields

Anna Edlinger, Chantal Herzog, Gina Garland, Florian Walder, Samiran Banerjee, Sonja G. Keel, Jochen Mayer, Laurent Philippot, Sana Romdhane, Marcus Schiedung, Michael W. I. Schmidt, Benjamin Seitz, Chloé Wüst-Galley, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden
{"title":"Compost Application Enhances Soil Health and Maintains Crop Yield: Insights From 56 Farmer-Managed Arable Fields","authors":"Anna Edlinger,&nbsp;Chantal Herzog,&nbsp;Gina Garland,&nbsp;Florian Walder,&nbsp;Samiran Banerjee,&nbsp;Sonja G. Keel,&nbsp;Jochen Mayer,&nbsp;Laurent Philippot,&nbsp;Sana Romdhane,&nbsp;Marcus Schiedung,&nbsp;Michael W. I. Schmidt,&nbsp;Benjamin Seitz,&nbsp;Chloé Wüst-Galley,&nbsp;Marcel G. A. van der Heijden","doi":"10.1002/sae2.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Improving soil health while maintaining crop yield is a key challenge for farmers. So far, only a few studies assessed the effects of compost and solid digestate application on soil health and plant yield under practical on-farm conditions across both organic and conventional cropping systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined 56 arable fields in Switzerland, managed either conventionally (<i>n</i> = 39) or organically (<i>n</i> = 17) by individual farmers. Fields were categorised based on their fertilisation history: standard fertilisation (<i>n</i> = 21), including livestock manure, slurry, and mineral fertilisers (reference), or with additional compost (<i>n</i> = 26) or solid digestate (<i>n</i> = 9) amendments. Soil health was assessed based on eight chemical, biological, and physical soil health indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compost use, but not solid digestate use, was associated with enhanced average soil health ( + 31% over reference fields), driven by increases in basal respiration ( + 45%), cation exchange capacity ( + 42%), fungal richness ( + 18%), and marginally higher soil organic carbon stocks ( + 28%). These differences were consistent across management systems, despite site variability. Clay content and extended periods of crop cover also positively influenced soil health. Wheat yields were 21% lower under organic management but unaffected by compost or digestate use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that using compost alongside practices like extended periods of crop cover can effectively promote soil health while maintaining yields in practical farming scenarios, offering a means to balance multiple sustainability goals simultaneously.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.70041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.70041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Improving soil health while maintaining crop yield is a key challenge for farmers. So far, only a few studies assessed the effects of compost and solid digestate application on soil health and plant yield under practical on-farm conditions across both organic and conventional cropping systems.

Materials and Methods

This study examined 56 arable fields in Switzerland, managed either conventionally (n = 39) or organically (n = 17) by individual farmers. Fields were categorised based on their fertilisation history: standard fertilisation (n = 21), including livestock manure, slurry, and mineral fertilisers (reference), or with additional compost (n = 26) or solid digestate (n = 9) amendments. Soil health was assessed based on eight chemical, biological, and physical soil health indicators.

Results

Compost use, but not solid digestate use, was associated with enhanced average soil health ( + 31% over reference fields), driven by increases in basal respiration ( + 45%), cation exchange capacity ( + 42%), fungal richness ( + 18%), and marginally higher soil organic carbon stocks ( + 28%). These differences were consistent across management systems, despite site variability. Clay content and extended periods of crop cover also positively influenced soil health. Wheat yields were 21% lower under organic management but unaffected by compost or digestate use.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that using compost alongside practices like extended periods of crop cover can effectively promote soil health while maintaining yields in practical farming scenarios, offering a means to balance multiple sustainability goals simultaneously.

Abstract Image

堆肥应用提高土壤健康和保持作物产量:来自56个农民管理耕地的见解
在保持作物产量的同时改善土壤健康是农民面临的主要挑战。到目前为止,只有少数研究评估了堆肥和固体消化液在实际农场条件下对有机和传统种植制度下土壤健康和植物产量的影响。材料和方法本研究调查了瑞士的56块耕地,由个体农民进行传统管理(n = 39)或有机管理(n = 17)。根据其施肥历史对田地进行分类:标准施肥(n = 21),包括畜禽粪便、泥浆和矿物肥料(参考),或添加堆肥(n = 26)或固体消化肥料(n = 9)。土壤健康是根据8个化学、生物和物理土壤健康指标来评估的。结果堆肥的使用,而非固体消化物的使用,与土壤平均健康状况的改善(比对照田增加31%)相关,这是由基础呼吸(增加45%)、阳离子交换能力(增加42%)、真菌丰富度(增加18%)和土壤有机碳储量(增加28%)的增加所驱动的。这些差异在不同的管理系统中是一致的,尽管地点不同。粘土含量和作物覆盖时间的延长对土壤健康也有积极影响。在有机管理下,小麦产量降低了21%,但不受堆肥或消化物使用的影响。这些发现表明,在延长作物覆盖时间的同时使用堆肥可以有效地促进土壤健康,同时在实际农业情景中保持产量,为同时平衡多个可持续发展目标提供了一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信