Establishing the Validity of a Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risks in Black Adolescents

Samantha Francois, Leslie Adams, Chavez Phelps
{"title":"Establishing the Validity of a Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risks in Black Adolescents","authors":"Samantha Francois,&nbsp;Leslie Adams,&nbsp;Chavez Phelps","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although rates of suicide among Black American youth have increased in recent years, few brief assessment tools have been culturally tailored and validated to better identify suicide risk for this population. The current study addresses this gap by testing the validity and reliability of the Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risk-short form (CARS-S) in an online sample of Black American adolescents. Three hundred eighty-one Black adolescents (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 17.5) completed a 13-item CARS-S measure online. Cronbach's alpha and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were computed in Stata v.15 and Mplus v.8.0. The revised CARS-S scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.82). A four-factor solution retained through exploratory analysis demonstrated the best model fit (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 46.62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; RMSEA = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.08 CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97) compared to other model solutions. Confirmatory analysis supported a four-factor model with no cross-loaded items. The four factors were: (1) Family conflict and idioms of distress-suicidal actions (four items); Social Support (two items); Minority-specific distress (three items); Idioms of distress-emotional/somatic and cultural sanctions (four items). Researchers conducting future suicide prevention research focused on Black American adolescents and including the CAR-S measure should consider the inclusion of items related to family conflict and racism-related stress to better capture risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although rates of suicide among Black American youth have increased in recent years, few brief assessment tools have been culturally tailored and validated to better identify suicide risk for this population. The current study addresses this gap by testing the validity and reliability of the Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risk-short form (CARS-S) in an online sample of Black American adolescents. Three hundred eighty-one Black adolescents (Mage = 17.5) completed a 13-item CARS-S measure online. Cronbach's alpha and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were computed in Stata v.15 and Mplus v.8.0. The revised CARS-S scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.82). A four-factor solution retained through exploratory analysis demonstrated the best model fit (χ2 = 46.62, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.08 CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97) compared to other model solutions. Confirmatory analysis supported a four-factor model with no cross-loaded items. The four factors were: (1) Family conflict and idioms of distress-suicidal actions (four items); Social Support (two items); Minority-specific distress (three items); Idioms of distress-emotional/somatic and cultural sanctions (four items). Researchers conducting future suicide prevention research focused on Black American adolescents and including the CAR-S measure should consider the inclusion of items related to family conflict and racism-related stress to better capture risk.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信