Establishing the Validity of a Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risks in Black Adolescents

Samantha Francois, Leslie Adams, Chavez Phelps
{"title":"Establishing the Validity of a Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risks in Black Adolescents","authors":"Samantha Francois,&nbsp;Leslie Adams,&nbsp;Chavez Phelps","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although rates of suicide among Black American youth have increased in recent years, few brief assessment tools have been culturally tailored and validated to better identify suicide risk for this population. The current study addresses this gap by testing the validity and reliability of the Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risk-short form (CARS-S) in an online sample of Black American adolescents. Three hundred eighty-one Black adolescents (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 17.5) completed a 13-item CARS-S measure online. Cronbach's alpha and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were computed in Stata v.15 and Mplus v.8.0. The revised CARS-S scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.82). A four-factor solution retained through exploratory analysis demonstrated the best model fit (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 46.62, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; RMSEA = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.08 CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97) compared to other model solutions. Confirmatory analysis supported a four-factor model with no cross-loaded items. The four factors were: (1) Family conflict and idioms of distress-suicidal actions (four items); Social Support (two items); Minority-specific distress (three items); Idioms of distress-emotional/somatic and cultural sanctions (four items). Researchers conducting future suicide prevention research focused on Black American adolescents and including the CAR-S measure should consider the inclusion of items related to family conflict and racism-related stress to better capture risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although rates of suicide among Black American youth have increased in recent years, few brief assessment tools have been culturally tailored and validated to better identify suicide risk for this population. The current study addresses this gap by testing the validity and reliability of the Cultural Assessment of Suicide Risk-short form (CARS-S) in an online sample of Black American adolescents. Three hundred eighty-one Black adolescents (Mage = 17.5) completed a 13-item CARS-S measure online. Cronbach's alpha and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were computed in Stata v.15 and Mplus v.8.0. The revised CARS-S scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.82). A four-factor solution retained through exploratory analysis demonstrated the best model fit (χ2 = 46.62, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01–0.08 CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97) compared to other model solutions. Confirmatory analysis supported a four-factor model with no cross-loaded items. The four factors were: (1) Family conflict and idioms of distress-suicidal actions (four items); Social Support (two items); Minority-specific distress (three items); Idioms of distress-emotional/somatic and cultural sanctions (four items). Researchers conducting future suicide prevention research focused on Black American adolescents and including the CAR-S measure should consider the inclusion of items related to family conflict and racism-related stress to better capture risk.

Abstract Image

建立黑人青少年自杀风险文化评估的有效性
尽管美国黑人青年的自杀率近年来有所上升,但很少有简短的评估工具在文化上进行了调整和验证,以更好地识别这一人群的自杀风险。目前的研究通过在美国黑人青少年的在线样本中测试自杀风险文化评估简表(CARS-S)的有效性和可靠性来解决这一差距。381名黑人青少年(智力= 17.5)在线完成了13项CARS-S量表。在Stata v.15和Mplus v.8.0中计算Cronbach's alpha和探索性和验证性因子分析。修订后的CARS-S量表具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.82)。探索性分析保留的四因素解显示模型拟合最佳(χ2 = 46.62, p < 0.001;Rmsea = 0.05, 95% ci = 0.01 ~ 0.08 cfi = 0.99;TLI = 0.97)。验证性分析支持一个没有交叉加载项目的四因素模型。这四个因素分别是:(1)家庭冲突和痛苦自杀行为习惯(四项);社会支持(两项);少数民族特有的痛苦(三项);关于痛苦的习语——情感/身体和文化制裁(四项)。未来针对美国黑人青少年进行自杀预防研究的研究人员应该考虑纳入与家庭冲突和种族主义相关的压力相关的项目,以更好地捕捉风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信