Morphological characteristics of permanent gullies and their relationship with topography in two typical agro-geomorphic regions of Northeast China

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Zhuoxin Chen, Qingchen Song, Mingming Guo, Pengchong Zhou, Lixin Wang, Qiang Chen, Xingyi Zhang
{"title":"Morphological characteristics of permanent gullies and their relationship with topography in two typical agro-geomorphic regions of Northeast China","authors":"Zhuoxin Chen,&nbsp;Qingchen Song,&nbsp;Mingming Guo,&nbsp;Pengchong Zhou,&nbsp;Lixin Wang,&nbsp;Qiang Chen,&nbsp;Xingyi Zhang","doi":"10.1002/esp.6044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gully erosion poses significant challenges to land degradation and food security. The Mollisols region of Northeast China (MNC) is the main grain-producing region in China. The low mountainous and hilly region (M<sub>FI</sub>) and the rolling hilly region (R<sub>FI</sub>), as the prominent topographic units in MNC, have suffered significantly from severe gully erosion. However, the actual situation and influencing factors of gully erosion in both regions are still unclear. Thus, we selected two field investigation regions of 103.4 km<sup>2</sup> in M<sub>FI</sub> and 123.9 km<sup>2</sup> in R<sub>FI</sub> to obtain a detailed inventory of gullies. Results showed that the gully number density in M<sub>FI</sub> was 25.7 No. km<sup>−2</sup>, 8.3 times greater than in R<sub>FI</sub>. Conversely, the gully average gully length (511.7 m), width (7.8 m) and depth (2.8 m) in R<sub>FI</sub> were 156.8%, 112.6% and 37.4% greater than those in M<sub>FI</sub>, respectively. The three types of gullies, developed in different land uses (GF, farmland; GW, woodland; GR, unpaved road), had significantly varying morphologies. In R<sub>FI</sub>, GF was the longest, and GW was the widest and deepest. Conversely, in M<sub>FI</sub>, GR was the longest but exhibited the least width and depth. Notably, farmland posed the highest risk of gully erosion in both M<sub>FI</sub> and R<sub>FI</sub>, with 74.4% and 89.6% of the gullies developed there, respectively. Topography was the critical factor influencing the differences in gully erosion between the two regions. To effectively control gully erosion, topographic conditions most susceptible to gully erosion should be prioritized for attention, e.g., slopes of 8–10° and 2–4° were the slope intervals most likely to contribute to gully development in M<sub>FI</sub> and R<sub>FI</sub>, respectively. We provide the potential for large-scale prediction of gully erosion. Corresponding prediction models based on gully area were provided and the effectiveness of the predictions was improved by separating different land uses. The study's findings could serve as a valuable foundation for gully erosion control and prediction for MNC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.6044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gully erosion poses significant challenges to land degradation and food security. The Mollisols region of Northeast China (MNC) is the main grain-producing region in China. The low mountainous and hilly region (MFI) and the rolling hilly region (RFI), as the prominent topographic units in MNC, have suffered significantly from severe gully erosion. However, the actual situation and influencing factors of gully erosion in both regions are still unclear. Thus, we selected two field investigation regions of 103.4 km2 in MFI and 123.9 km2 in RFI to obtain a detailed inventory of gullies. Results showed that the gully number density in MFI was 25.7 No. km−2, 8.3 times greater than in RFI. Conversely, the gully average gully length (511.7 m), width (7.8 m) and depth (2.8 m) in RFI were 156.8%, 112.6% and 37.4% greater than those in MFI, respectively. The three types of gullies, developed in different land uses (GF, farmland; GW, woodland; GR, unpaved road), had significantly varying morphologies. In RFI, GF was the longest, and GW was the widest and deepest. Conversely, in MFI, GR was the longest but exhibited the least width and depth. Notably, farmland posed the highest risk of gully erosion in both MFI and RFI, with 74.4% and 89.6% of the gullies developed there, respectively. Topography was the critical factor influencing the differences in gully erosion between the two regions. To effectively control gully erosion, topographic conditions most susceptible to gully erosion should be prioritized for attention, e.g., slopes of 8–10° and 2–4° were the slope intervals most likely to contribute to gully development in MFI and RFI, respectively. We provide the potential for large-scale prediction of gully erosion. Corresponding prediction models based on gully area were provided and the effectiveness of the predictions was improved by separating different land uses. The study's findings could serve as a valuable foundation for gully erosion control and prediction for MNC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信