The Immigration-Related Political Ideology Scale: Development, factor structure, and validity evidence

IF 1.8 4区社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1111/asap.12429

Seth J. Schwartz, Maria Duque, Sumeyra Sahbaz, Carolina Scaramutti Gladfelter, Mia Cisco, Lea Nehme-Kotocavage, Duyen H. Vo, Aigerim Alpysbekova, Pablo Montero-Zamora, Beyhan Ertanir, David De Coninck, Natalia Bogado, Deborah J. Schildkraut

{"title":"The Immigration-Related Political Ideology Scale: Development, factor structure, and validity evidence","authors":"Seth J. Schwartz, Maria Duque, Sumeyra Sahbaz, Carolina Scaramutti Gladfelter, Mia Cisco, Lea Nehme-Kotocavage, Duyen H. Vo, Aigerim Alpysbekova, Pablo Montero-Zamora, Beyhan Ertanir, David De Coninck, Natalia Bogado, Deborah J. Schildkraut","doi":"10.1111/asap.12429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Immigration-Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS), designed to measure diverse political perspectives on immigration among US voters. The IRPIS was developed following a series of focus groups and refined through a systematic item-generation process involving expert panels. The scale was validated using a two-step factor analysis with a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters, divided into exploratory (<i>n</i> = 632) and confirmatory (<i>n</i> = 660) sub-samples. The exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors: conservative views, welcoming attitudes, world regions, flexibility, assimilationist expectations, multicultural expectations, and undocumented immigrant rights. Confirmatory factor analysis provided an acceptable fit (CFI = .901; RMSEA = .050), and the scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas ranging from .89 to .97). Inter-factor correlations varied, with strong links observed among welcoming attitudes, flexibility, and multicultural expectations (<i>r</i>’s > .80), confirming a polarization between liberal and conservative stances on immigration. These findings suggest that the IRPIS is the first scale specifically designed to assess immigration-related political orientations in a polarized US context. This tool has important implications for political strategy and policymaking, especially in the context of rising immigration rates and political polarization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Public Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>The present study validates the Immigration-Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS) using a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters. Immigration remains a highly polarizing issue, with deeply entrenched ideological differences influencing policy preferences and public discourse. Exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors and confirmed a clear polarization between liberal and conservative views on immigration. The IRPIS represents a critical tool for research, political strategy, and policymaking.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Immigration-Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS), designed to measure diverse political perspectives on immigration among US voters. The IRPIS was developed following a series of focus groups and refined through a systematic item-generation process involving expert panels. The scale was validated using a two-step factor analysis with a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters, divided into exploratory (n = 632) and confirmatory (n = 660) sub-samples. The exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors: conservative views, welcoming attitudes, world regions, flexibility, assimilationist expectations, multicultural expectations, and undocumented immigrant rights. Confirmatory factor analysis provided an acceptable fit (CFI = .901; RMSEA = .050), and the scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas ranging from .89 to .97). Inter-factor correlations varied, with strong links observed among welcoming attitudes, flexibility, and multicultural expectations (r’s > .80), confirming a polarization between liberal and conservative stances on immigration. These findings suggest that the IRPIS is the first scale specifically designed to assess immigration-related political orientations in a polarized US context. This tool has important implications for political strategy and policymaking, especially in the context of rising immigration rates and political polarization.

Public Significance Statement

The present study validates the Immigration-Related Political Ideology Scale (IRPIS) using a nationally representative sample of 1292 US voters. Immigration remains a highly polarizing issue, with deeply entrenched ideological differences influencing policy preferences and public discourse. Exploratory factor analysis identified seven distinct factors and confirmed a clear polarization between liberal and conservative views on immigration. The IRPIS represents a critical tool for research, political strategy, and policymaking.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.