Monkeypox Virus Outbreak 2022: Assessment of Knowledge Among Healthcare Workers in Two Countries—India and Saudi Arabia

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1155/ijcp/6921394

Sachin Naik, Sajith Vellappally, Abdulaziz Abdullah Al Kheraif, Majed M. Alsarani, Santhosh Basavarajappa, Raghad Khalid Alhassoun, Mohamed Hashem, Hassan Fouad, Murtaza Saleem, Faisal Ali M Asiri, Meshal Saeed Mohammed Awaiyer

{"title":"Monkeypox Virus Outbreak 2022: Assessment of Knowledge Among Healthcare Workers in Two Countries—India and Saudi Arabia","authors":"Sachin Naik, Sajith Vellappally, Abdulaziz Abdullah Al Kheraif, Majed M. Alsarani, Santhosh Basavarajappa, Raghad Khalid Alhassoun, Mohamed Hashem, Hassan Fouad, Murtaza Saleem, Faisal Ali M Asiri, Meshal Saeed Mohammed Awaiyer","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/6921394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n Background: Healthcare workers play a crucial role in limiting the spread of the monkeypox virus. Studies show that healthcare worker’s (HCWs) understanding and communication about preventing infectious diseases can inspire various groups of individuals.\n Objective: This study aimed to compare the knowledge of HCWs in India and Saudi Arabia regarding monkeypox virus infection.\n Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among HCWs in India and Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was developed using information from the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites. The validation of the questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87) was conducted for data collection. The mean scores between different demographic groups were compared using Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA.\n Results: A total of 848 participants responded to the questionnaire (India = 424 and Saudi Arabia = 424). The average knowledge score in India was 12.59 ± 2.49, and in Saudi Arabia, it was 13.25 ± 2.99 out of 20. The percentage of participants with good knowledge about monkeypox was 22.2% in India and 36.1% in Saudi Arabia. Participants with poor knowledge about monkeypox constituted 11% in India and 12% in Saudi Arabia.\n Conclusion: HCWs in both countries had moderate to poor knowledge about the monkeypox outbreak. This might be because monkeypox is not prevalent in these countries. More education is needed to improve HCWs knowledge about monkeypox infection.\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/6921394","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/6921394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers play a crucial role in limiting the spread of the monkeypox virus. Studies show that healthcare worker’s (HCWs) understanding and communication about preventing infectious diseases can inspire various groups of individuals.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the knowledge of HCWs in India and Saudi Arabia regarding monkeypox virus infection.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among HCWs in India and Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was developed using information from the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites. The validation of the questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87) was conducted for data collection. The mean scores between different demographic groups were compared using Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA.

Results: A total of 848 participants responded to the questionnaire (India = 424 and Saudi Arabia = 424). The average knowledge score in India was 12.59 ± 2.49, and in Saudi Arabia, it was 13.25 ± 2.99 out of 20. The percentage of participants with good knowledge about monkeypox was 22.2% in India and 36.1% in Saudi Arabia. Participants with poor knowledge about monkeypox constituted 11% in India and 12% in Saudi Arabia.

Conclusion: HCWs in both countries had moderate to poor knowledge about the monkeypox outbreak. This might be because monkeypox is not prevalent in these countries. More education is needed to improve HCWs knowledge about monkeypox infection.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2022年猴痘病毒爆发：印度和沙特阿拉伯两国医护人员知识评估

背景：卫生保健工作者在限制猴痘病毒传播方面发挥着至关重要的作用。研究表明，卫生保健工作者（HCWs）对预防传染病的理解和沟通可以激励不同群体的个人。目的：本研究旨在比较印度和沙特阿拉伯卫生保健员对猴痘病毒感染的认识。方法：对印度和沙特阿拉伯的卫生保健工作者进行横断面调查。这份调查问卷是根据世界卫生组织和疾病控制与预防中心网站上的信息编制的。对问卷进行验证（Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87）以收集数据。不同人口统计学组间的平均得分比较采用学生t检验和单因素方差分析。结果：共有848名参与者回应了问卷（印度= 424，沙特阿拉伯= 424）。印度的平均知识得分为12.59±2.49，沙特阿拉伯的平均知识得分为13.25±2.99（满分20分）。对猴痘有良好了解的参与者比例在印度为22.2%，在沙特阿拉伯为36.1%。对猴痘缺乏了解的参与者在印度占11%，在沙特阿拉伯占12%。结论：两国卫生保健工作者对猴痘疫情的了解程度中等或较差。这可能是因为猴痘在这些国家并不流行。需要更多的教育来提高卫生保健工作者对猴痘感染的认识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Clinical Practice 医学-医学：内科

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

274

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.