The pet trade of native species outside of their natural distributions within Australia is a biosecurity risk

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Adam Toomes, Oliver C. Stringham, Stephanie Moncayo, Katherine G. W. Hill, Jacob Maher, Freyja Watters, Sebastian Chekunov, Pablo García-Díaz, Lewis Mitchell, Joshua V. Ross, Phillip Cassey
{"title":"The pet trade of native species outside of their natural distributions within Australia is a biosecurity risk","authors":"Adam Toomes,&nbsp;Oliver C. Stringham,&nbsp;Stephanie Moncayo,&nbsp;Katherine G. W. Hill,&nbsp;Jacob Maher,&nbsp;Freyja Watters,&nbsp;Sebastian Chekunov,&nbsp;Pablo García-Díaz,&nbsp;Lewis Mitchell,&nbsp;Joshua V. Ross,&nbsp;Phillip Cassey","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The trade of alien species as pets is increasingly recognized as a biosecurity risk due to their intentional and accidental release into the wild. However, pets are often categorized as native or non-native at a national level, meaning that their presence outside of their native range, yet within their native country, may be an overlooked biosecurity threat. So-called “domestic non-natives” have established new populations across several countries and, in some cases, become invasive. Here, we investigated the extent of the domestic trade of native Australian pet species outside of their natural distributions and determined whether such locations were climatically suitable for potential alien establishments. Australia provides a unique system to explore this issue because it deters the trade of most alien species yet permits the keeping of a large diversity of native pets. We monitored trade from a popular Australian e-commerce site used to trade native pet birds, reptiles, and amphibians (29 k advertisements over 1 year; from July 2019 to July 2020). Of the 177 native vertebrate species we observed in the pet trade, 129 species (73%) had at least some instances of their trade occurring outside of their natural distribution. We found that climatically suitable environments were present outside the native range of 90 species and that these regions were proximal to suburbs where we observed trade. Our results indicate that the “domestic non-native” trade is widespread in Australia and that, if captive pets escape or are released into the wild in sufficient numbers, there is a risk of establishment for most of these species. We suggest that regulations pertaining to the trade of native pets ensure that careful biosecurity consideration is given in circumstances when trade occurs beyond a species' native range, both in the context of Australia and for other large countries with widespread pet industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13298","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trade of alien species as pets is increasingly recognized as a biosecurity risk due to their intentional and accidental release into the wild. However, pets are often categorized as native or non-native at a national level, meaning that their presence outside of their native range, yet within their native country, may be an overlooked biosecurity threat. So-called “domestic non-natives” have established new populations across several countries and, in some cases, become invasive. Here, we investigated the extent of the domestic trade of native Australian pet species outside of their natural distributions and determined whether such locations were climatically suitable for potential alien establishments. Australia provides a unique system to explore this issue because it deters the trade of most alien species yet permits the keeping of a large diversity of native pets. We monitored trade from a popular Australian e-commerce site used to trade native pet birds, reptiles, and amphibians (29 k advertisements over 1 year; from July 2019 to July 2020). Of the 177 native vertebrate species we observed in the pet trade, 129 species (73%) had at least some instances of their trade occurring outside of their natural distribution. We found that climatically suitable environments were present outside the native range of 90 species and that these regions were proximal to suburbs where we observed trade. Our results indicate that the “domestic non-native” trade is widespread in Australia and that, if captive pets escape or are released into the wild in sufficient numbers, there is a risk of establishment for most of these species. We suggest that regulations pertaining to the trade of native pets ensure that careful biosecurity consideration is given in circumstances when trade occurs beyond a species' native range, both in the context of Australia and for other large countries with widespread pet industries.

Abstract Image

在澳大利亚本土物种的自然分布之外进行宠物贸易是一种生物安全风险
作为宠物的外来物种的交易越来越被认为是一种生物安全风险,因为它们被故意或意外地释放到野外。然而,在国家层面上,宠物通常被分类为原生或非原生,这意味着它们在其原生范围之外出现,但在其原生国家,可能是一个被忽视的生物安全威胁。所谓的“国内非本地人”已经在几个国家建立了新的种群,在某些情况下,成为入侵。在这里,我们调查了澳大利亚本土宠物物种在其自然分布之外的国内贸易程度,并确定这些地点的气候是否适合潜在的外来场所。澳大利亚提供了一个独特的系统来探讨这个问题,因为它阻止了大多数外来物种的交易,但却允许饲养各种各样的本地宠物。我们监测了一个流行的澳大利亚电子商务网站的贸易,该网站用于交易本地宠物鸟、爬行动物和两栖动物(1年29k个广告;2019年7月至2020年7月)。在我们观察到的177种本地脊椎动物中,129种(73%)至少有一些交易发生在其自然分布之外。我们发现气候适宜的环境存在于90种物种的本地范围之外,并且这些区域靠近我们观察到的贸易的郊区。我们的研究结果表明,“国内非本地”贸易在澳大利亚很普遍,如果圈养宠物逃脱或被释放到野外的数量足够多,大多数这些物种都有生存的风险。我们建议,无论是在澳大利亚还是其他拥有广泛宠物产业的大国,有关本地宠物贸易的法规都应确保在交易超出物种本地范围的情况下,仔细考虑生物安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信