Who Is Queer Enough for Queer Research?: The Issue of Absence Within Queer Research

Dominik Drabent, Maya Wenzel
{"title":"Who Is Queer Enough for Queer Research?: The Issue of Absence Within Queer Research","authors":"Dominik Drabent,&nbsp;Maya Wenzel","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the inclusion of queer people in research—as well as the application of queer research methods and methodologies that some call queer research—has been on the rise, too often, certain voices are not heard. Not all groups of people who fall under the umbrella term of “queer” are included in queer research. By looking at the examples of asexuality and queer Muslims in this paper, we offer some insights on how people in these groups are often absent in queer research and how cis-heteronormativity alongside compulsory sexuality, allonormativity, homonationalism and homocapitalism operates within queer communities and queer research, with exclusion often being the result. Through the utilization of intersectional feminism, transnational feminism, and queer of color critique as our methodological approach, we show how these experiences stand exemplary for the absence of some queer communities from queer research. Furthermore, such a methodological approach can assist us to understand the role of cis-heteronormativity in queer research and what we can do to become more inclusive when undertaking queer research projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the inclusion of queer people in research—as well as the application of queer research methods and methodologies that some call queer research—has been on the rise, too often, certain voices are not heard. Not all groups of people who fall under the umbrella term of “queer” are included in queer research. By looking at the examples of asexuality and queer Muslims in this paper, we offer some insights on how people in these groups are often absent in queer research and how cis-heteronormativity alongside compulsory sexuality, allonormativity, homonationalism and homocapitalism operates within queer communities and queer research, with exclusion often being the result. Through the utilization of intersectional feminism, transnational feminism, and queer of color critique as our methodological approach, we show how these experiences stand exemplary for the absence of some queer communities from queer research. Furthermore, such a methodological approach can assist us to understand the role of cis-heteronormativity in queer research and what we can do to become more inclusive when undertaking queer research projects.

对酷儿研究来说,谁够酷儿?:酷儿研究中的缺席问题
尽管将酷儿人群纳入研究——以及酷儿研究方法和方法论的应用(有些人称之为酷儿研究)——一直在上升,但往往有些声音没有被听到。并不是所有被称为“酷儿”的人群都被包括在酷儿研究中。通过观察本文中无性恋和酷儿穆斯林的例子,我们提供了一些见解,说明这些群体中的人如何经常缺席酷儿研究,以及顺异性恋与强制性性行为、异性规范、同性恋民族主义和同性恋资本主义如何在酷儿社区和酷儿研究中运作,结果往往是被排斥。通过交叉女权主义、跨国女权主义和有色酷儿批判作为我们的方法论方法,我们展示了这些经历如何成为酷儿研究中缺乏一些酷儿社区的典范。此外,这种方法论方法可以帮助我们理解顺式异性恋在酷儿研究中的作用,以及我们在开展酷儿研究项目时可以做些什么来变得更具包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信