Mala Virdee, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Emma J. D. Boland, Emily Shuckburgh, Alison Ming
{"title":"Spatial and temporal dependence in distribution-based evaluation of CMIP6 daily maximum temperatures","authors":"Mala Virdee, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Emma J. D. Boland, Emily Shuckburgh, Alison Ming","doi":"10.1002/asl.1290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate models are increasingly used to derive localised, specific information to guide adaptation to climate change. Model projections of future scenarios are conferred credibility by evaluating model skill in reproducing large-scale properties of the observed climate system. Model evaluation at fine spatial and temporal scales and for rare extreme events is critical for provision of reliable adaptation-relevant information, but may be challenging given significant internal variability and limited observed data in this setting. Comparing distributions of physical variables from historical simulations of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project models against observed distributions provides a comprehensive, concise and physically-justified skill measure. Calculating divergence between distributions requires aggregation of data spatially or temporally. The spatial and temporal scales at which a divergence measure converges to a consistent value can indicate the scales at which a well-defined climate signal emerges from internal variability. Below this threshold, there may be insufficient data for robust evaluation, particularly for rare extremes. Here, the behaviour of several divergence measures in response to spatial and temporal aggregation is analysed empirically to give a novel evaluation of CMIP6 daily maximum temperature simulations against reanalysis. Some key insights presented here can inform methodological choices made when deriving adaptation-relevant information. Convergence varies according to model, geographic region and divergence measure; selection of the level of precision at which models can provide reliable information therefore requires a context-specific understanding. For this purpose, an interactive tool provided alongside this study demonstrates scale-dependent evaluation across several geographic regions. Commonly applied measures are found to be only weakly sensitive to discrepancies in the tails of distributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50734,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Science Letters","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1290","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate models are increasingly used to derive localised, specific information to guide adaptation to climate change. Model projections of future scenarios are conferred credibility by evaluating model skill in reproducing large-scale properties of the observed climate system. Model evaluation at fine spatial and temporal scales and for rare extreme events is critical for provision of reliable adaptation-relevant information, but may be challenging given significant internal variability and limited observed data in this setting. Comparing distributions of physical variables from historical simulations of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project models against observed distributions provides a comprehensive, concise and physically-justified skill measure. Calculating divergence between distributions requires aggregation of data spatially or temporally. The spatial and temporal scales at which a divergence measure converges to a consistent value can indicate the scales at which a well-defined climate signal emerges from internal variability. Below this threshold, there may be insufficient data for robust evaluation, particularly for rare extremes. Here, the behaviour of several divergence measures in response to spatial and temporal aggregation is analysed empirically to give a novel evaluation of CMIP6 daily maximum temperature simulations against reanalysis. Some key insights presented here can inform methodological choices made when deriving adaptation-relevant information. Convergence varies according to model, geographic region and divergence measure; selection of the level of precision at which models can provide reliable information therefore requires a context-specific understanding. For this purpose, an interactive tool provided alongside this study demonstrates scale-dependent evaluation across several geographic regions. Commonly applied measures are found to be only weakly sensitive to discrepancies in the tails of distributions.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Science Letters (ASL) is a wholly Open Access electronic journal. Its aim is to provide a fully peer reviewed publication route for new shorter contributions in the field of atmospheric and closely related sciences. Through its ability to publish shorter contributions more rapidly than conventional journals, ASL offers a framework that promotes new understanding and creates scientific debate - providing a platform for discussing scientific issues and techniques.
We encourage the presentation of multi-disciplinary work and contributions that utilise ideas and techniques from parallel areas. We particularly welcome contributions that maximise the visualisation capabilities offered by a purely on-line journal. ASL welcomes papers in the fields of: Dynamical meteorology; Ocean-atmosphere systems; Climate change, variability and impacts; New or improved observations from instrumentation; Hydrometeorology; Numerical weather prediction; Data assimilation and ensemble forecasting; Physical processes of the atmosphere; Land surface-atmosphere systems.