Two New Calibration Techniques of Lumped-Parameter Mathematical Models for the Cardiovascular System

IF 2.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andrea Tonini, Francesco Regazzoni, Matteo Salvador, Luca Dede', Roberto Scrofani, Laura Fusini, Chiara Cogliati, Gianluca Pontone, Christian Vergara, Alfio Quarteroni
{"title":"Two New Calibration Techniques of Lumped-Parameter Mathematical Models for the Cardiovascular System","authors":"Andrea Tonini,&nbsp;Francesco Regazzoni,&nbsp;Matteo Salvador,&nbsp;Luca Dede',&nbsp;Roberto Scrofani,&nbsp;Laura Fusini,&nbsp;Chiara Cogliati,&nbsp;Gianluca Pontone,&nbsp;Christian Vergara,&nbsp;Alfio Quarteroni","doi":"10.1002/nme.7648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cardiocirculatory mathematical models are valuable tools for investigating both physiological and pathological conditions of the circulatory system. To assess an individual's clinical condition, these models must be tailored through parameter calibration. This study introduces a novel calibration method for a lumped-parameter cardiocirculatory model, by leveraging on the correlation matrix between model parameters and outputs to adjust the latter based on observed data. We evaluate the performance of our method, both independently and in combination with the L-BFGS-B optimization algorithm (Limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with Bound constraints), and we compare our results with those of L-BFGS-B alone. Using synthetic data, we show that both the correlation matrix calibration method and the combined one reduce the loss function of the optimization problem more effectively than L-BFGS-B. Moreover, the correlation matrix calibration method exhibits greater robustness to the initial parameter guess than both the combined method and L-BFGS-B. When applied to noisy data, all three calibration methods achieve comparable results. Although the correlation matrix calibration method yields less accurate parameter estimates than L-BFGS-B, in a real-world clinical case, the two new calibration methods provide clinical insights comparable to L-BFGS-B. Notably, the correlation matrix calibration method is three times faster than the other two calibration methods. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our new calibration method for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nme.7648","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.7648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiocirculatory mathematical models are valuable tools for investigating both physiological and pathological conditions of the circulatory system. To assess an individual's clinical condition, these models must be tailored through parameter calibration. This study introduces a novel calibration method for a lumped-parameter cardiocirculatory model, by leveraging on the correlation matrix between model parameters and outputs to adjust the latter based on observed data. We evaluate the performance of our method, both independently and in combination with the L-BFGS-B optimization algorithm (Limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with Bound constraints), and we compare our results with those of L-BFGS-B alone. Using synthetic data, we show that both the correlation matrix calibration method and the combined one reduce the loss function of the optimization problem more effectively than L-BFGS-B. Moreover, the correlation matrix calibration method exhibits greater robustness to the initial parameter guess than both the combined method and L-BFGS-B. When applied to noisy data, all three calibration methods achieve comparable results. Although the correlation matrix calibration method yields less accurate parameter estimates than L-BFGS-B, in a real-world clinical case, the two new calibration methods provide clinical insights comparable to L-BFGS-B. Notably, the correlation matrix calibration method is three times faster than the other two calibration methods. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our new calibration method for clinical applications.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
276
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering publishes original papers describing significant, novel developments in numerical methods that are applicable to engineering problems. The Journal is known for welcoming contributions in a wide range of areas in computational engineering, including computational issues in model reduction, uncertainty quantification, verification and validation, inverse analysis and stochastic methods, optimisation, element technology, solution techniques and parallel computing, damage and fracture, mechanics at micro and nano-scales, low-speed fluid dynamics, fluid-structure interaction, electromagnetics, coupled diffusion phenomena, and error estimation and mesh generation. It is emphasized that this is by no means an exhaustive list, and particularly papers on multi-scale, multi-physics or multi-disciplinary problems, and on new, emerging topics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信