Phenomapping the Response of Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy With Reduced Ejection Fraction to Surgical Revascularization

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tejus Satish, Nicholas S. Hendren, Matthias Peltz, Christopher A. Heid, Maryjane Farr, Anthony Bavry, Saket Girotra, Dharam J. Kumbhani, Mark H. Drazner, W. H. Wilson Tang, Justin L. Grodin
{"title":"Phenomapping the Response of Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy With Reduced Ejection Fraction to Surgical Revascularization","authors":"Tejus Satish,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Hendren,&nbsp;Matthias Peltz,&nbsp;Christopher A. Heid,&nbsp;Maryjane Farr,&nbsp;Anthony Bavry,&nbsp;Saket Girotra,&nbsp;Dharam J. Kumbhani,&nbsp;Mark H. Drazner,&nbsp;W. H. Wilson Tang,&nbsp;Justin L. Grodin","doi":"10.1002/clc.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has demonstrated long-term mortality benefits in patients with HFREF and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but whether phenotypic heterogeneity influences the benefits of CABG is unknown. We applied clustering analysis to STICHES (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure Extension Study) to identify phenogroups with different long-term risk profiles and investigate differences in CABG benefits between phenogroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>STICHES was a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of CABG in addition to medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. We split the STICHES participants into derivation (<i>n</i> = 753) and validation (<i>n</i> = 459) cohorts. We phenomapped the derivation cohort using penalized model-based clustering. We fit multivariable Cox models to investigate long-term differences in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and a composite of all-cause mortality/CV hospitalization between phenogroups and whether phenogroup assignment modified the effects of CABG on these outcomes. Findings were internally validated on the validation cohort. Four phenogroups were identified in the derivation cohort. The highest-risk group was at a twofold greater risk of death (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.4–2.9, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and CV death (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3–3.1, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and a 1.5-fold greater risk for death/CV hospitalization (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.1, <i>p</i> = 0.016). Phenogroup assignment did not modify the effects of CABG on the outcomes (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05 for all). Similar results were obtained in the validation cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The beneficial effects of CABG on all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and a composite of all-cause mortality and CV hospitalization persist despite phenotypic heterogeneity in HFREF and CAD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has demonstrated long-term mortality benefits in patients with HFREF and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but whether phenotypic heterogeneity influences the benefits of CABG is unknown. We applied clustering analysis to STICHES (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure Extension Study) to identify phenogroups with different long-term risk profiles and investigate differences in CABG benefits between phenogroups.

Methods and Results

STICHES was a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of CABG in addition to medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. We split the STICHES participants into derivation (n = 753) and validation (n = 459) cohorts. We phenomapped the derivation cohort using penalized model-based clustering. We fit multivariable Cox models to investigate long-term differences in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and a composite of all-cause mortality/CV hospitalization between phenogroups and whether phenogroup assignment modified the effects of CABG on these outcomes. Findings were internally validated on the validation cohort. Four phenogroups were identified in the derivation cohort. The highest-risk group was at a twofold greater risk of death (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.4–2.9, p < 0.001) and CV death (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3–3.1, p = 0.002), and a 1.5-fold greater risk for death/CV hospitalization (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.1, p = 0.016). Phenogroup assignment did not modify the effects of CABG on the outcomes (p > 0.05 for all). Similar results were obtained in the validation cohort.

Conclusions

The beneficial effects of CABG on all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and a composite of all-cause mortality and CV hospitalization persist despite phenotypic heterogeneity in HFREF and CAD.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信