Efficacy of Organic-Based Substrate Formulation of Bacillus Strains and Trichoderma asperellum Against Fusarium Wilt of Cashew

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Stanslaus A. Lilai, Juma Hussein, Fortunus A. Kapinga, Wilson A. Nene, Stela G. Temu, Donatha D. Tibuhwa
{"title":"Efficacy of Organic-Based Substrate Formulation of Bacillus Strains and Trichoderma asperellum Against Fusarium Wilt of Cashew","authors":"Stanslaus A. Lilai,&nbsp;Juma Hussein,&nbsp;Fortunus A. Kapinga,&nbsp;Wilson A. Nene,&nbsp;Stela G. Temu,&nbsp;Donatha D. Tibuhwa","doi":"10.1111/jph.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Biological control has emerged as a leading approach in managing crop diseases including Fusarium wilt of cashew caused by <i>Fusarium oxysporum</i> f.sp. <i>anacardi</i>. However, this approach is limited by the high cost of commercially available growth media and ultimately lacks applications at the farmer's level. The study examined three organic-based substrate formulations (rice bran, rice husk and their combination) of four combined <i>Bacillus</i> strains (<i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 4/5021 and <i>Bacillus velenzesis</i> 10/5140, 11/A + 1 and 13/A + 3) or <i>Trichoderma asperellum</i> to control the disease. The experiments were conducted in farmers' fields in 2021/2022 and 2022/2023. The treatments were applied once during the rainy season by soil drenching at a rate of 20 mL of bioformulation per litre of water around each tree. The results revealed that the treated cashew trees had significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) lower final disease severity (between 15.17% and 33.75% in 2021/2022 and 14.43%–31.93% in 2022/2023) than the untreated trees (77.17% and 89.31%, respectively). The only treatment that was not significantly different from the control was the rice husk–<i>T. asperellum</i> formulation in both years. In treated plots, disease severity decreased over time each year, whereas disease severity increased in untreated trees. Based on these results, the three formulations of <i>Bacillus</i> strains and two of the <i>Trichoderma asperellum</i> formulations (bran-based or bran–husk combination) should be evaluated further for the management of Fusarium wilt of cashew. This study offers a potential solution to utilise locally available organic substrates for developing liquid-based formulations of biological control agents.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological control has emerged as a leading approach in managing crop diseases including Fusarium wilt of cashew caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. anacardi. However, this approach is limited by the high cost of commercially available growth media and ultimately lacks applications at the farmer's level. The study examined three organic-based substrate formulations (rice bran, rice husk and their combination) of four combined Bacillus strains (Bacillus subtilis 4/5021 and Bacillus velenzesis 10/5140, 11/A + 1 and 13/A + 3) or Trichoderma asperellum to control the disease. The experiments were conducted in farmers' fields in 2021/2022 and 2022/2023. The treatments were applied once during the rainy season by soil drenching at a rate of 20 mL of bioformulation per litre of water around each tree. The results revealed that the treated cashew trees had significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower final disease severity (between 15.17% and 33.75% in 2021/2022 and 14.43%–31.93% in 2022/2023) than the untreated trees (77.17% and 89.31%, respectively). The only treatment that was not significantly different from the control was the rice husk–T. asperellum formulation in both years. In treated plots, disease severity decreased over time each year, whereas disease severity increased in untreated trees. Based on these results, the three formulations of Bacillus strains and two of the Trichoderma asperellum formulations (bran-based or bran–husk combination) should be evaluated further for the management of Fusarium wilt of cashew. This study offers a potential solution to utilise locally available organic substrates for developing liquid-based formulations of biological control agents.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信