Disparities in healthcare, STI testing, and PrEP access among newcomer sexual minority men in Canada's three largest urban centers

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Paolo A. Palma, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, Jessie Dawson, Reza Zandi, Terri Zhang, Evan Campbell, Darrell H. S. Tan, Nathan J. Lachowsky, Joseph Cox, Gilles Lambert, Milada Dvorakova, Allan Lal, Jody Jollimore, Daniel Grace, Trevor A. Hart
{"title":"Disparities in healthcare, STI testing, and PrEP access among newcomer sexual minority men in Canada's three largest urban centers","authors":"Paolo A. Palma,&nbsp;Shayna Skakoon-Sparling,&nbsp;Jessie Dawson,&nbsp;Reza Zandi,&nbsp;Terri Zhang,&nbsp;Evan Campbell,&nbsp;Darrell H. S. Tan,&nbsp;Nathan J. Lachowsky,&nbsp;Joseph Cox,&nbsp;Gilles Lambert,&nbsp;Milada Dvorakova,&nbsp;Allan Lal,&nbsp;Jody Jollimore,&nbsp;Daniel Grace,&nbsp;Trevor A. Hart","doi":"10.1111/asap.12448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) are more likely to be diagnosed with HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared with the general population. Although newcomers generally experience a health advantage in Canada compared with non-immigrants and more established immigrants (i.e., healthy immigrant effect), they also experience disparities in access to healthcare services. These disparities, in turn, may lead to unique vulnerabilities for the sexual health of GBM immigrants. We examined disparities in healthcare access, STI testing, and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among immigrant and non-immigrant GBM. Using baseline data (collected between February 2017 and August 2019) from a multisite cohort study of GBM in Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal (<i>n</i> = 2449), we found that newcomer GBM (migrated ≤ 5 years prior) were less likely to report having a primary healthcare provider than non-immigrants. This had a weak indirect effect in mediating both access to STI testing and the use of HIV PrEP. These disparities dissipated after controlling for migration precarity (e.g., refugees and those without permanent residency), suggesting that disparities in newcomer GBM healthcare access may, in part, be driven by the large number of newcomers with precarious migration statuses.</p><p><b>Public Significance Statement</b>: New immigrants tend to be less likely to have a primary healthcare provider or use other sexual health clinics, which can have adverse consequences for sexual health. This disparity appears to be largely concentrated among temporary foreign workers, international students, and refugees. Interventions should target policies that increase the number of primary healthcare providers, and address immigration policies that lead to fear of deportation due to one's health.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12448","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) are more likely to be diagnosed with HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared with the general population. Although newcomers generally experience a health advantage in Canada compared with non-immigrants and more established immigrants (i.e., healthy immigrant effect), they also experience disparities in access to healthcare services. These disparities, in turn, may lead to unique vulnerabilities for the sexual health of GBM immigrants. We examined disparities in healthcare access, STI testing, and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among immigrant and non-immigrant GBM. Using baseline data (collected between February 2017 and August 2019) from a multisite cohort study of GBM in Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal (n = 2449), we found that newcomer GBM (migrated ≤ 5 years prior) were less likely to report having a primary healthcare provider than non-immigrants. This had a weak indirect effect in mediating both access to STI testing and the use of HIV PrEP. These disparities dissipated after controlling for migration precarity (e.g., refugees and those without permanent residency), suggesting that disparities in newcomer GBM healthcare access may, in part, be driven by the large number of newcomers with precarious migration statuses.

Public Significance Statement: New immigrants tend to be less likely to have a primary healthcare provider or use other sexual health clinics, which can have adverse consequences for sexual health. This disparity appears to be largely concentrated among temporary foreign workers, international students, and refugees. Interventions should target policies that increase the number of primary healthcare providers, and address immigration policies that lead to fear of deportation due to one's health.

Abstract Image

加拿大三个最大城市中心新来的性少数男性在医疗保健、性传播感染检测和PrEP获取方面的差异
与普通人群相比,同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBM)更容易被诊断出患有艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染(STIs)。虽然与非移民和更成熟的移民相比,新移民在加拿大普遍享有健康优势(即健康移民效应),但他们在获得保健服务方面也存在差异。这些差异反过来可能导致GBM移民在性健康方面的独特脆弱性。我们检查了移民和非移民GBM在医疗保健获取、性传播感染检测和HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)使用方面的差异。使用来自多伦多、温哥华和蒙特利尔的GBM多站点队列研究(n = 2449)的基线数据(收集于2017年2月至2019年8月),我们发现新移民GBM(迁移≤5年前)报告拥有初级医疗保健提供者的可能性低于非移民。这在中介获得性传播感染检测和使用艾滋病毒预防方面产生了微弱的间接影响。在控制了移民不稳定性(例如,难民和没有永久居留权的人)之后,这些差异消失了,这表明新移民在GBM医疗保健获取方面的差异可能部分是由大量移民身份不稳定的新移民造成的。公共意义声明:新移民往往不太可能有初级保健提供者或使用其他性健康诊所,这可能对性健康产生不利后果。这种差异似乎主要集中在临时外国工人、国际学生和难民中。干预措施应针对增加初级卫生保健提供者数量的政策,并解决导致因健康原因而担心被驱逐出境的移民政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信