Heterogeneous fracture toughness of human cortical bone tissue

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maxime Levy, Zohar Yosibash
{"title":"Heterogeneous fracture toughness of human cortical bone tissue","authors":"Maxime Levy,&nbsp;Zohar Yosibash","doi":"10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CT-based finite element analysis (FEA) of human bones helps estimate fracture risk in clinical practice by linking bone ash density (<span>\\(\\rho _{ash}\\)</span>) to mechanical parameters. However, phase field models for fracture prediction require the heterogeneous fracture toughness <span>\\(G_{Ic}\\)</span>, which can be derived from the critical stress intensity factor <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span>, determined through various experimental methods. Due to a lack of standards for determining cortical bone’s <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span>, an experimental campaign is presented using 53 cortical specimens from two fresh frozen femurs to investigate whether a correlation exists between <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\rho _{ash}\\)</span>. We investigated various experimental techniques for correlating <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span> with <span>\\(\\rho _{ash}\\)</span>. We conducted FEAs employing the phase field method (PFM) to determine the most suitable correlation among the five possible ones stemming from the experimental methods. The ASTM standard using displacement at force application point was found to be the recommended experimental method for the estimation of <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span> perpendicular to osteons’ direction </p><div><div><span>$$\\begin{aligned} K_{Ic} [MPa\\sqrt{m}]{=}1.89\\left( \\rho _{ash} [gr/cc] \\right) ^{1.88} \\,\\, R^2{=}0.5374. \\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>The corresponding statistical critical energy release rate bounds were determined: </p><div><div><span>$$\\begin{aligned} G_{Ic}[N/m]= 321.94 (\\rho _{ash}[gr/cc])^{1.69} \\times exp(\\pm 2SD), \\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>with a standard deviation <span>\\(SD= 0.30\\)</span> representing a 95.4% confidence interval. The average <span>\\(G_{Ic}\\)</span> resulted in good correlations between the predicted fracture force by PFM-FEA of four representative specimens and experimental fracture forces. The proposed correlations will be used in CT-based PFM FEA to estimate the risk of hip and humeral fractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":590,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fracture","volume":"249 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fracture","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CT-based finite element analysis (FEA) of human bones helps estimate fracture risk in clinical practice by linking bone ash density (\(\rho _{ash}\)) to mechanical parameters. However, phase field models for fracture prediction require the heterogeneous fracture toughness \(G_{Ic}\), which can be derived from the critical stress intensity factor \(K_{Ic}\), determined through various experimental methods. Due to a lack of standards for determining cortical bone’s \(K_{Ic}\), an experimental campaign is presented using 53 cortical specimens from two fresh frozen femurs to investigate whether a correlation exists between \(K_{Ic}\) and \(\rho _{ash}\). We investigated various experimental techniques for correlating \(K_{Ic}\) with \(\rho _{ash}\). We conducted FEAs employing the phase field method (PFM) to determine the most suitable correlation among the five possible ones stemming from the experimental methods. The ASTM standard using displacement at force application point was found to be the recommended experimental method for the estimation of \(K_{Ic}\) perpendicular to osteons’ direction

$$\begin{aligned} K_{Ic} [MPa\sqrt{m}]{=}1.89\left( \rho _{ash} [gr/cc] \right) ^{1.88} \,\, R^2{=}0.5374. \end{aligned}$$

The corresponding statistical critical energy release rate bounds were determined:

$$\begin{aligned} G_{Ic}[N/m]= 321.94 (\rho _{ash}[gr/cc])^{1.69} \times exp(\pm 2SD), \end{aligned}$$

with a standard deviation \(SD= 0.30\) representing a 95.4% confidence interval. The average \(G_{Ic}\) resulted in good correlations between the predicted fracture force by PFM-FEA of four representative specimens and experimental fracture forces. The proposed correlations will be used in CT-based PFM FEA to estimate the risk of hip and humeral fractures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fracture
International Journal of Fracture 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fracture is an outlet for original analytical, numerical and experimental contributions which provide improved understanding of the mechanisms of micro and macro fracture in all materials, and their engineering implications. The Journal is pleased to receive papers from engineers and scientists working in various aspects of fracture. Contributions emphasizing empirical correlations, unanalyzed experimental results or routine numerical computations, while representing important necessary aspects of certain fatigue, strength, and fracture analyses, will normally be discouraged; occasional review papers in these as well as other areas are welcomed. Innovative and in-depth engineering applications of fracture theory are also encouraged. In addition, the Journal welcomes, for rapid publication, Brief Notes in Fracture and Micromechanics which serve the Journal''s Objective. Brief Notes include: Brief presentation of a new idea, concept or method; new experimental observations or methods of significance; short notes of quality that do not amount to full length papers; discussion of previously published work in the Journal, and Brief Notes Errata.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信