Performance Comparison of Different Rapid Freeze–Quench Strategies for Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

IF 1.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL
Maruan Bracci, Ilenia Serra, Inés García-Rubio, Sabine Van Doorslaer
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Different Rapid Freeze–Quench Strategies for Electron Paramagnetic Resonance","authors":"Maruan Bracci,&nbsp;Ilenia Serra,&nbsp;Inés García-Rubio,&nbsp;Sabine Van Doorslaer","doi":"10.1007/s00723-024-01725-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work addresses the development of a custom-made home-built rapid freeze–quench (RFQ) device and the comparison of its performance to the one of a commercial RFQ setup that was in-house custom adapted. Both systems consist of two syringes that push the reactants into a mixing chamber and the products to a subsequent freezing setup. Using the binding of azide to myoglobin as a calibration reaction, the quenching times of the different setups were compared, evaluating different instrumental parameters, such as software-controlled variation of the aging time, variations of the flow rate and variations of the distance travelled by the mixed sample before freezing. In addition to minimal sample consumption, the home-built RFQ device was found to lead to the shorter reaction times which could be controlled in a time range from 10 to 25 ms. The commercial RFQ system yielded optimal reaction control in a time range from 50 to 200 ms, although a larger volume of reactants needed to be used due to the significant dead volume of the system. Three different freezing methods were also evaluated, among which, in our hands, freezing the jet directly in a deep bath of cold isopentane yielded shorter and reproducible freezing times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":469,"journal":{"name":"Applied Magnetic Resonance","volume":"56 1-2","pages":"229 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00723-024-01725-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work addresses the development of a custom-made home-built rapid freeze–quench (RFQ) device and the comparison of its performance to the one of a commercial RFQ setup that was in-house custom adapted. Both systems consist of two syringes that push the reactants into a mixing chamber and the products to a subsequent freezing setup. Using the binding of azide to myoglobin as a calibration reaction, the quenching times of the different setups were compared, evaluating different instrumental parameters, such as software-controlled variation of the aging time, variations of the flow rate and variations of the distance travelled by the mixed sample before freezing. In addition to minimal sample consumption, the home-built RFQ device was found to lead to the shorter reaction times which could be controlled in a time range from 10 to 25 ms. The commercial RFQ system yielded optimal reaction control in a time range from 50 to 200 ms, although a larger volume of reactants needed to be used due to the significant dead volume of the system. Three different freezing methods were also evaluated, among which, in our hands, freezing the jet directly in a deep bath of cold isopentane yielded shorter and reproducible freezing times.

电子顺磁共振不同快速冻灭策略的性能比较
这项工作解决了定制的家用快速冻灭(RFQ)设备的开发,并将其性能与内部定制的商业RFQ设置之一进行了比较。两个系统都由两个注射器组成,将反应物推入混合室,将产物推入随后的冷冻装置。利用叠氮化物与肌红蛋白的结合作为校准反应,比较了不同装置的淬火时间,评估了不同的仪器参数,如软件控制的老化时间变化、流速变化和混合样品在冷冻前移动距离的变化。除了最小的样品消耗,自制RFQ装置被发现导致更短的反应时间,可以控制在10到25毫秒的时间范围内。商用RFQ系统在50到200毫秒的时间内产生了最佳的反应控制,尽管由于系统的大量死体积需要使用更大的反应物。我们还评估了三种不同的冷冻方法,其中,在我们手中,直接在冷异戊烷的深浴中冷冻射流可以获得更短且可重复的冷冻时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Magnetic Resonance
Applied Magnetic Resonance 物理-光谱学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Magnetic Resonance provides an international forum for the application of magnetic resonance in physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, geochemistry, ecology, engineering, and related fields. The contents include articles with a strong emphasis on new applications, and on new experimental methods. Additional features include book reviews and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信