Statistical analysis and ground motion effects on corner buildings with infill walls collapsed during the September 19, 2017 earthquake in Mexico

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
J. I. López, J. M. Jara, H. Varum, B. A. Olmos
{"title":"Statistical analysis and ground motion effects on corner buildings with infill walls collapsed during the September 19, 2017 earthquake in Mexico","authors":"J. I. López,&nbsp;J. M. Jara,&nbsp;H. Varum,&nbsp;B. A. Olmos","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02085-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The September 19, 2017 earthquake (Mw = 7.1) struck México between the states of Puebla and Morelos. The ground motion damaged buildings near the epicenter and in Mexico City, with 44 collapsed buildings and many more experiencing some level of damage. The study gathers and statistically analyzes all available information, identifying characteristics in the plan and elevation of the damaged structures. The analysis identified structural issues typically associated with damage, such as buildings with soft or flexible ground floors and corner buildings supported by reinforced concrete frames. Corner buildings often have infill walls on two sides adjacent to neighboring properties, which, when connected to columns, cause significant torsional effects. The corner effect, combined with other structural pathologies such as soft-story, irregular building shapes, and seismic amplification effects in some city regions, significantly contributed to the damage and building collapses presented during the earthquake. The results, in addition to showing damage statistics for buildings located in a corner with infill walls, showed that the facade walls in the corner provide very little lateral stiffness comparatively to the stiffness of the perimeter walls situated on the other two sides of the building, which causes significant torsion in the building. The study also revealed that corner buildings with infill walls next to low-rise buildings were significantly more at risk than those surrounded by buildings of similar heights. A non-linear analysis of a case study showed that the observed earthquake damages in corner buildings were indeed expected, given the building’s seismic demands obtained with the numerical model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 2","pages":"605 - 642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02085-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The September 19, 2017 earthquake (Mw = 7.1) struck México between the states of Puebla and Morelos. The ground motion damaged buildings near the epicenter and in Mexico City, with 44 collapsed buildings and many more experiencing some level of damage. The study gathers and statistically analyzes all available information, identifying characteristics in the plan and elevation of the damaged structures. The analysis identified structural issues typically associated with damage, such as buildings with soft or flexible ground floors and corner buildings supported by reinforced concrete frames. Corner buildings often have infill walls on two sides adjacent to neighboring properties, which, when connected to columns, cause significant torsional effects. The corner effect, combined with other structural pathologies such as soft-story, irregular building shapes, and seismic amplification effects in some city regions, significantly contributed to the damage and building collapses presented during the earthquake. The results, in addition to showing damage statistics for buildings located in a corner with infill walls, showed that the facade walls in the corner provide very little lateral stiffness comparatively to the stiffness of the perimeter walls situated on the other two sides of the building, which causes significant torsion in the building. The study also revealed that corner buildings with infill walls next to low-rise buildings were significantly more at risk than those surrounded by buildings of similar heights. A non-linear analysis of a case study showed that the observed earthquake damages in corner buildings were indeed expected, given the building’s seismic demands obtained with the numerical model.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信