Isabel Urdaneta, Ramon E. Vera, Ronald Marquez, Keren A. Vivas, Fernando Urdaneta, Stephanie Gongora, Ryen Frazier, Jorge Franco, Yefrid Cordoba, Hasan Jameel, Raine Viitala, Guylaine Harbec, Jessica Carette, Joel Pawlak, Ronalds Gonzalez
{"title":"Assessing and predicting the softness of hygiene tissue containing alternative fibers","authors":"Isabel Urdaneta, Ramon E. Vera, Ronald Marquez, Keren A. Vivas, Fernando Urdaneta, Stephanie Gongora, Ryen Frazier, Jorge Franco, Yefrid Cordoba, Hasan Jameel, Raine Viitala, Guylaine Harbec, Jessica Carette, Joel Pawlak, Ronalds Gonzalez","doi":"10.1007/s10570-024-06289-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Softness, a key attribute in hygiene tissue, has traditionally been determined via consumer panel tests. These collective tests involve trained judges (panelists) who express their subjective judgments of softness to rank and compare hygiene tissue products, which become time and resource-intensive measurements. The tissue softness analyzer (TSA, Emtec, Germany) has been utilized to measure softness in uncreped handsheets with conventional fibers, but it fails to assess products with alternative fibers accurately. As a single-frequency parameter, the so-called TS7 value from the TSA does not capture the full range of acoustic properties that contribute to the perceived softness of uncreped hygiene tissue containing alternative fibers. In this work, we developed and validated a rigorous statistical model capable of quantitatively, accurately, and reproducibly predict softness for uncreped tissue paper containing non-wood fibers, including agricultural residues (e.g., wheat straw) and dedicated fiber crops (e.g., miscanthus, switchgrass, sorghum and bamboo). Softness panel test scores were collected using a novel technique for sensory assessment, the Optimized Sensory Panel Test (O-SPT), which employs Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgement. The model was built by integrating softness values (handfeel scores) from panel tests, along with the physical and morphological properties of both wood-derived and non-wood fibers. The model demonstrated 98% accuracy in predicting softness compared to panel tests scores. The results will provide valuable tools for softness prediction that will be beneficial for product development in the hygiene tissue industry.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><p>Methodology to develop and validate a rigorous statistical model that can quantitatively accurately, and reproducibly predict softness for hygiene tissue containing alternative fibers </p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"32 2","pages":"1171 - 1199"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-024-06289-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Softness, a key attribute in hygiene tissue, has traditionally been determined via consumer panel tests. These collective tests involve trained judges (panelists) who express their subjective judgments of softness to rank and compare hygiene tissue products, which become time and resource-intensive measurements. The tissue softness analyzer (TSA, Emtec, Germany) has been utilized to measure softness in uncreped handsheets with conventional fibers, but it fails to assess products with alternative fibers accurately. As a single-frequency parameter, the so-called TS7 value from the TSA does not capture the full range of acoustic properties that contribute to the perceived softness of uncreped hygiene tissue containing alternative fibers. In this work, we developed and validated a rigorous statistical model capable of quantitatively, accurately, and reproducibly predict softness for uncreped tissue paper containing non-wood fibers, including agricultural residues (e.g., wheat straw) and dedicated fiber crops (e.g., miscanthus, switchgrass, sorghum and bamboo). Softness panel test scores were collected using a novel technique for sensory assessment, the Optimized Sensory Panel Test (O-SPT), which employs Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgement. The model was built by integrating softness values (handfeel scores) from panel tests, along with the physical and morphological properties of both wood-derived and non-wood fibers. The model demonstrated 98% accuracy in predicting softness compared to panel tests scores. The results will provide valuable tools for softness prediction that will be beneficial for product development in the hygiene tissue industry.
Graphical abstract
Methodology to develop and validate a rigorous statistical model that can quantitatively accurately, and reproducibly predict softness for hygiene tissue containing alternative fibers
期刊介绍:
Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.