Cefotetan versus cefoxitin in the treatment of patients with biliary sepsis assessed by a biliary sepsis score.

A Basoli, M Schietroma, F Fiocca, G Vigliardi, V Speranza
{"title":"Cefotetan versus cefoxitin in the treatment of patients with biliary sepsis assessed by a biliary sepsis score.","authors":"A Basoli,&nbsp;M Schietroma,&nbsp;F Fiocca,&nbsp;G Vigliardi,&nbsp;V Speranza","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors carried out a study to assess the efficacy of an antibiotic treatment (cefotetan or cefoxitin) in 22 stratified patients with biliary sepsis, at low and high risk. The severity of sepsis was assessed by a biliary sepsis score (B.S.S.). No significant difference in results was observed between the two treatments in low-risk groups (cefotetan 80%, cefoxitin 75% satisfactory), while the difference between the high risk groups was significant (cefotetan 75%, cefoxitin 40% satisfactory). In the low risk group it can be stated that better nutritional and immunological status provide adequate host defences and that the antibiotic treatment is less important in determining surgical outcome. In high risk patients the efficacy of an antibiotic, cefotetan in this case, can significantly improve clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":"7 4","pages":"237-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors carried out a study to assess the efficacy of an antibiotic treatment (cefotetan or cefoxitin) in 22 stratified patients with biliary sepsis, at low and high risk. The severity of sepsis was assessed by a biliary sepsis score (B.S.S.). No significant difference in results was observed between the two treatments in low-risk groups (cefotetan 80%, cefoxitin 75% satisfactory), while the difference between the high risk groups was significant (cefotetan 75%, cefoxitin 40% satisfactory). In the low risk group it can be stated that better nutritional and immunological status provide adequate host defences and that the antibiotic treatment is less important in determining surgical outcome. In high risk patients the efficacy of an antibiotic, cefotetan in this case, can significantly improve clinical results.

通过胆道败血症评分评估头孢替坦与头孢西丁治疗胆道败血症患者的疗效。
作者进行了一项研究,评估抗生素治疗(头孢替坦或头孢西丁)对22例低风险和高风险胆道脓毒症患者的疗效。通过胆汁脓毒症评分(bss)评估脓毒症的严重程度。低危组(头孢替坦80%,头孢西丁75%满意)两种治疗效果差异无统计学意义,高危组(头孢替坦75%,头孢西丁40%满意)两种治疗效果差异有统计学意义。在低风险组中,可以这样说,更好的营养和免疫状态提供了足够的宿主防御,抗生素治疗在决定手术结果方面不太重要。在高危患者中,抗生素头孢替坦的疗效可以显著改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信