Development of a digital Creative Figural Design Test (CFDT): An approach to integrating divergent and convergent processes

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Pei-Zhen Chen , Ching-Lin Wu , Hsueh-Chih Chen
{"title":"Development of a digital Creative Figural Design Test (CFDT): An approach to integrating divergent and convergent processes","authors":"Pei-Zhen Chen ,&nbsp;Ching-Lin Wu ,&nbsp;Hsueh-Chih Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional design fluency tests assess an individual's fluency in figural thinking. This fluency is considered a component of executive function, but is also an indicator of divergent thinking in creative thinking tests. However, few studies have examined the creative potential in design fluency tests. In addition, traditional tests are typically administered using pen and paper, making scoring relatively cumbersome and time-consuming; and, other indicators of divergent thinking (such as flexibility and originality) can be developed in traditional tests. Therefore, this study aims to develop a digital Creative Figural Design Test (CFDT) and use digital scoring methods to explore the creative processes and potential within design fluency tests. In phase one, the CFDT was developed, establishing norms for design fluency, design flexibility, and design originality based on 428 participants’ responses to 200 correct designs. Design flexibility was classified into nine categories through the feature detection rules. For design originality, participants’ responses to the 200 correct designs were scored based on frequency. In phase two, digital scoring of the CFDT was established, allowing for instant calculation of three indicators and comparison with norms. 143 participants were invited to finish the CFDT and validity tests (including divergent thinking test and remote associates test). Reliability analysis showed an acceptable test-retest reliability for three indicators. Validity analysis indicated that the design fluency was positively correlated with the two creative tests, while design flexibility and design originality were only correlated with divergent thinking. We have developed a new open-source tool that further understands the relationship between executive function and creativity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101716"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional design fluency tests assess an individual's fluency in figural thinking. This fluency is considered a component of executive function, but is also an indicator of divergent thinking in creative thinking tests. However, few studies have examined the creative potential in design fluency tests. In addition, traditional tests are typically administered using pen and paper, making scoring relatively cumbersome and time-consuming; and, other indicators of divergent thinking (such as flexibility and originality) can be developed in traditional tests. Therefore, this study aims to develop a digital Creative Figural Design Test (CFDT) and use digital scoring methods to explore the creative processes and potential within design fluency tests. In phase one, the CFDT was developed, establishing norms for design fluency, design flexibility, and design originality based on 428 participants’ responses to 200 correct designs. Design flexibility was classified into nine categories through the feature detection rules. For design originality, participants’ responses to the 200 correct designs were scored based on frequency. In phase two, digital scoring of the CFDT was established, allowing for instant calculation of three indicators and comparison with norms. 143 participants were invited to finish the CFDT and validity tests (including divergent thinking test and remote associates test). Reliability analysis showed an acceptable test-retest reliability for three indicators. Validity analysis indicated that the design fluency was positively correlated with the two creative tests, while design flexibility and design originality were only correlated with divergent thinking. We have developed a new open-source tool that further understands the relationship between executive function and creativity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信