Impact of the replacement of polyethylene with waste from orange juicing on the physico-chemical, microbiological, and sensory quality of packaged bread

IF 8.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Haile Tesfaye Duguma , Jack Fehlberg , Peter Macke , Laurent M. Matuana , Sungeun Cho , Eva Almenar
{"title":"Impact of the replacement of polyethylene with waste from orange juicing on the physico-chemical, microbiological, and sensory quality of packaged bread","authors":"Haile Tesfaye Duguma ,&nbsp;Jack Fehlberg ,&nbsp;Peter Macke ,&nbsp;Laurent M. Matuana ,&nbsp;Sungeun Cho ,&nbsp;Eva Almenar","doi":"10.1016/j.fpsl.2024.101417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to evaluate the impact of the partial substitution of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) with orange peel powder (OPP) on packaged bread's physico-chemical, microbiological, and sensory quality. Pouches made of low-density polyethylene, LLDPE, and LLDPE/OPP differing in OPP loadings (5, 10 &amp; 11.5 wt%) were used as control, blank, and treatments, respectively. The quality of the packaged bread was assessed by determining its weight loss, firmness, hue angle, lightness, and fungal growth during 11 days at 23ºC and 50 % RH and performing two similarity triangle tests. Consumers’ acceptability of the novel packaging was determined using an acceptance test. The results show no significant differences between packaging with and without OPP in bread firmness, fungal growth, hue angle, lightness, and sensory attributes. A slight difference in bread weight loss (&lt;1 %) was observed between the LLPDE/OPP packages and the control at the end of storage. Bread’s weight loss and firmness increased, hue angle increased and then decreased, and lightness decreased during storage (p &lt; 0.05) regardless of the packaging type. The consumer acceptance test showed no significant differences between the LLDPE/OPP-5 % and LLDPE/OPP-11.5 % pouches in liking of all sensory properties (e.g., appearance, color, smell) except transparency. This study demonstrates that storage time has a stronger weight on sliced bread shelf life than the replacement of up to 11.5 % plastic with waste from orange juicing. Furthermore, this study shows that OPP can be used as a plastic filler for food packages based on the similar performance of packaging containing OPP and commercial packaging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12377,"journal":{"name":"Food Packaging and Shelf Life","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101417"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Packaging and Shelf Life","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214289424001820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the partial substitution of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) with orange peel powder (OPP) on packaged bread's physico-chemical, microbiological, and sensory quality. Pouches made of low-density polyethylene, LLDPE, and LLDPE/OPP differing in OPP loadings (5, 10 & 11.5 wt%) were used as control, blank, and treatments, respectively. The quality of the packaged bread was assessed by determining its weight loss, firmness, hue angle, lightness, and fungal growth during 11 days at 23ºC and 50 % RH and performing two similarity triangle tests. Consumers’ acceptability of the novel packaging was determined using an acceptance test. The results show no significant differences between packaging with and without OPP in bread firmness, fungal growth, hue angle, lightness, and sensory attributes. A slight difference in bread weight loss (<1 %) was observed between the LLPDE/OPP packages and the control at the end of storage. Bread’s weight loss and firmness increased, hue angle increased and then decreased, and lightness decreased during storage (p < 0.05) regardless of the packaging type. The consumer acceptance test showed no significant differences between the LLDPE/OPP-5 % and LLDPE/OPP-11.5 % pouches in liking of all sensory properties (e.g., appearance, color, smell) except transparency. This study demonstrates that storage time has a stronger weight on sliced bread shelf life than the replacement of up to 11.5 % plastic with waste from orange juicing. Furthermore, this study shows that OPP can be used as a plastic filler for food packages based on the similar performance of packaging containing OPP and commercial packaging.
用橙汁废渣替代聚乙烯对包装面包理化、微生物和感官品质的影响
本研究旨在评价橙皮粉(OPP)部分替代线性低密度聚乙烯(LLDPE)对包装面包理化、微生物和感官品质的影响。由低密度聚乙烯,LLDPE和LLDPE/OPP制成的袋,不同的OPP负载(5,10 &;11.5 wt%)分别作为对照、空白和处理。在23ºC和50 % RH条件下,通过测定11天内包装面包的失重、硬度、色相角、亮度和真菌生长情况,并进行两次相似三角形试验来评估包装面包的质量。消费者对新包装的可接受性是通过验收测试来确定的。结果表明,添加和未添加OPP的包装在面包硬度、真菌生长、色调角、亮度和感官属性方面没有显著差异。在储存结束时,在LLPDE/OPP包装和对照组之间观察到面包重量损失的轻微差异(<1 %)。在贮藏过程中,面包的失重和硬度增加,色相角先增大后减小,轻度降低(p <; 0.05)。消费者接受测试显示,LLDPE/OPP-5 %和LLDPE/OPP-11.5 %袋子在所有感官特性(例如,外观,颜色,气味)方面没有显著差异,除了透明度。这项研究表明,储存时间对切片面包保质期的影响比用橙汁废料替代高达11. %的塑料更大。此外,本研究表明,基于含有OPP的包装与商业包装的相似性能,OPP可以用作食品包装的塑料填料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Packaging and Shelf Life
Food Packaging and Shelf Life Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
214
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Food packaging is crucial for preserving food integrity throughout the distribution chain. It safeguards against contamination by physical, chemical, and biological agents, ensuring the safety and quality of processed foods. The evolution of novel food packaging, including modified atmosphere and active packaging, has extended shelf life, enhancing convenience for consumers. Shelf life, the duration a perishable item remains suitable for sale, use, or consumption, is intricately linked with food packaging, emphasizing its role in maintaining product quality and safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信