Rates of change and longitudinal variability of using multiple OCT retinal nerve fibre layer ring sizes in glaucoma

Vincent Tran , Matteo Posarelli , Minas T Coroneo , Mark Batterbury , Jeremy C.K. Tan
{"title":"Rates of change and longitudinal variability of using multiple OCT retinal nerve fibre layer ring sizes in glaucoma","authors":"Vincent Tran ,&nbsp;Matteo Posarelli ,&nbsp;Minas T Coroneo ,&nbsp;Mark Batterbury ,&nbsp;Jeremy C.K. Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the proportion of segmentation errors, rates of change and longitudinal variability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cp-RNFL) global and sectoral thickness measurements when using three different ring sizes in a cohort of healthy and glaucomatous eyes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>205 eyes of 105 patients with normal, suspect or manifest glaucoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Subjects underwent cp-RNFL scans on four or more consecutive follow up visits (mean follow up 4.5 years). Scans were taken using the Spectralis® OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Global thickness and six sectoral thickness values in the three ring sizes (3.5, 4.1, 4.7 mm) were extracted. Longitudinal variability was quantified by mean absolute regression residuals (MAR).</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Rates of change (RoC) and longitudinal variability of global and sectoral cp-RNFL thickness across three ring sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The rate of global cp-RNFL thinning in the 3.5 mm ring was -0.40 µm/year (CI -0.58 to -0.22, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), while the inferotemporal sector displayed the greatest rate of thinning (-0.97 µm/year, CI -1.26 to -0.68, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the RoC of thickness values in the 4.1 mm and 4.7 mm compared to the 3.5 mm ring size in the global or any of the six sectors. Longitudinal variability was consistently lower in the 4.7 mm compared to the smaller ring sizes, with a significant difference observed in the inferonasal, inferotemporal and superonasal sectors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While there was no significant difference in the global and sectoral RoC across ring sizes, the larger RNFL ring sizes demonstrated significantly lower longitudinal variability for inferonasal, inferotemporal and superonasal sectors compared to the smaller ring sizes. Using larger RNFL ring sizes may therefore provide more accurate estimates of the true rate of change overtime.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the proportion of segmentation errors, rates of change and longitudinal variability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cp-RNFL) global and sectoral thickness measurements when using three different ring sizes in a cohort of healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects

205 eyes of 105 patients with normal, suspect or manifest glaucoma.

Methods

Subjects underwent cp-RNFL scans on four or more consecutive follow up visits (mean follow up 4.5 years). Scans were taken using the Spectralis® OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Global thickness and six sectoral thickness values in the three ring sizes (3.5, 4.1, 4.7 mm) were extracted. Longitudinal variability was quantified by mean absolute regression residuals (MAR).

Main outcome measures

Rates of change (RoC) and longitudinal variability of global and sectoral cp-RNFL thickness across three ring sizes.

Results

The rate of global cp-RNFL thinning in the 3.5 mm ring was -0.40 µm/year (CI -0.58 to -0.22, p < 0.001), while the inferotemporal sector displayed the greatest rate of thinning (-0.97 µm/year, CI -1.26 to -0.68, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the RoC of thickness values in the 4.1 mm and 4.7 mm compared to the 3.5 mm ring size in the global or any of the six sectors. Longitudinal variability was consistently lower in the 4.7 mm compared to the smaller ring sizes, with a significant difference observed in the inferonasal, inferotemporal and superonasal sectors.

Conclusions

While there was no significant difference in the global and sectoral RoC across ring sizes, the larger RNFL ring sizes demonstrated significantly lower longitudinal variability for inferonasal, inferotemporal and superonasal sectors compared to the smaller ring sizes. Using larger RNFL ring sizes may therefore provide more accurate estimates of the true rate of change overtime.
青光眼多OCT视网膜神经纤维层环大小的变化率和纵向变异性
目的比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)乳头状视网膜周围神经纤维层(cp-RNFL)整体和局部厚度测量在使用三种不同环尺寸时的分割错误率、变化率和纵向变异性。设计回顾性队列研究。对象105例正常、疑似或明显青光眼患者205眼。方法受试者在4次或4次以上连续随访(平均随访时间为4.5年)中接受cp-RNFL扫描。使用Spectralis®OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany)进行扫描。提取了三种环尺寸(3.5、4.1、4.7 mm)的整体厚度和六个部门厚度值。纵向变异性用平均绝对回归残差(MAR)量化。主要结果测量全球和部门cp-RNFL厚度在三个环尺寸上的变化率(RoC)和纵向变异性。结果全球3.5 mm环cp-RNFL变薄速率为-0.40µm/年(CI -0.58 ~ -0.22, p <;0.001),而颞下扇区表现出最大的变薄速率(-0.97µm/年,CI -1.26 ~ -0.68, p <;0.001)。与全球或六个扇区中的任何一个扇区的3.5 mm环尺寸相比,4.1 mm和4.7 mm的厚度值的RoC无显著差异。与较小的环尺寸相比,4.7 mm的纵向变异性始终较低,在鼻间、颞下和鼻上扇区观察到显著差异。结论:虽然环尺寸在整体和部门RoC上没有显著差异,但较大的RNFL环尺寸在鼻间、颞下和鼻上扇区的纵向变异性明显低于较小的环尺寸。因此,使用更大的RNFL环尺寸可以更准确地估计随时间变化的真实速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信