“Where” and “What” Do Adolescent Athletes Learn When It Comes to Food Literacy Compared With Adolescents that Do Not Play Sports? A Gender-Based Thematic Analysis

IF 3.8 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Alysha L Deslippe , Coralie Bergeron , Olivia Y Wu , Kimberley J Hernandez , Emilie Comtois-Rousseau , Tamara R Cohen
{"title":"“Where” and “What” Do Adolescent Athletes Learn When It Comes to Food Literacy Compared With Adolescents that Do Not Play Sports? A Gender-Based Thematic Analysis","authors":"Alysha L Deslippe ,&nbsp;Coralie Bergeron ,&nbsp;Olivia Y Wu ,&nbsp;Kimberley J Hernandez ,&nbsp;Emilie Comtois-Rousseau ,&nbsp;Tamara R Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Food literacy skills (e.g., nutrition knowledge, social, cultural, economic, and environmental impacts of food) play a role in high school (13–18 y) athletes’ health and performance. Literature suggests that adolescents are rarely taught concepts beyond nutrition knowledge, and experiences differ with gender or sports involvement. To improve all adolescents’ food literacy, we aimed to clarify differences in athletes’ and nonathletes’ food literacy to inform food literacy program design.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to contrast athletes’ and nonathletes’ food literacy using a gender lens.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted 33 semistructured interviews with adolescents from a high school. Adolescents were recruited to balance sports involvement and sex with each self-identifying their gender (<em>n</em> = 15 boys; <em>n</em> = 14 girls; <em>n</em> = 4 nonbinary). Using inductive and deductive techniques, we thematically analyzed the data. Deductive codes were drawn from the Food Literacy for Young Adults Framework including Functional (e.g., nutrition literacy), Relational (e.g., joy in shared meals), and Systems (e.g., food sustainability) competencies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Functional competencies were learned most and often through social media. When it came to differences in food literacy experiences between athletes and nonathletes, athletes valued more credible sources of information (e.g., parents compared with peers) and viewed food as fuel (e.g., eating for hunger cues) instead of as a way to form social bonds. Gender also played a role in adolescents’ recognition of the connection between food and mental health (function competency) and the sources of information athlete boys and girls valued (personal knowledge compared with romantic partners).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Improving all adolescents’ food literacy starts with developing skills to judge information credibility (e.g., media literacy). Programs, where adolescent athletes and nonathletes learn together,should also address challenges these groups face, such as eating for performance compared with socialization, the impact of gender on how adolescents view associations between food and mental health, and credible sources of information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 104525"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Food literacy skills (e.g., nutrition knowledge, social, cultural, economic, and environmental impacts of food) play a role in high school (13–18 y) athletes’ health and performance. Literature suggests that adolescents are rarely taught concepts beyond nutrition knowledge, and experiences differ with gender or sports involvement. To improve all adolescents’ food literacy, we aimed to clarify differences in athletes’ and nonathletes’ food literacy to inform food literacy program design.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to contrast athletes’ and nonathletes’ food literacy using a gender lens.

Methods

We conducted 33 semistructured interviews with adolescents from a high school. Adolescents were recruited to balance sports involvement and sex with each self-identifying their gender (n = 15 boys; n = 14 girls; n = 4 nonbinary). Using inductive and deductive techniques, we thematically analyzed the data. Deductive codes were drawn from the Food Literacy for Young Adults Framework including Functional (e.g., nutrition literacy), Relational (e.g., joy in shared meals), and Systems (e.g., food sustainability) competencies.

Results

Functional competencies were learned most and often through social media. When it came to differences in food literacy experiences between athletes and nonathletes, athletes valued more credible sources of information (e.g., parents compared with peers) and viewed food as fuel (e.g., eating for hunger cues) instead of as a way to form social bonds. Gender also played a role in adolescents’ recognition of the connection between food and mental health (function competency) and the sources of information athlete boys and girls valued (personal knowledge compared with romantic partners).

Conclusions

Improving all adolescents’ food literacy starts with developing skills to judge information credibility (e.g., media literacy). Programs, where adolescent athletes and nonathletes learn together,should also address challenges these groups face, such as eating for performance compared with socialization, the impact of gender on how adolescents view associations between food and mental health, and credible sources of information.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信