Public policy and sustainability: How green core competence, government trust, and policy satisfaction influence green R&D investments in the private sector

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fadi Abdelfattah , Mohammed Salah , Khalid Dahleez , Riyad Darwazeh , Hussam Al Halbusi
{"title":"Public policy and sustainability: How green core competence, government trust, and policy satisfaction influence green R&D investments in the private sector","authors":"Fadi Abdelfattah ,&nbsp;Mohammed Salah ,&nbsp;Khalid Dahleez ,&nbsp;Riyad Darwazeh ,&nbsp;Hussam Al Halbusi","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how green innovation practices influence organizational capabilities and investments in sustainability within Omani firms. Grounded in Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory, it explores the relationship between Green Product Innovation Performance (GPIP), Green Process Innovation Performance (GPcIP), Green Core Competence (GCC), and Green Research and Development (R&amp;D) Investments. Data collected from 214 top management personnel across diverse industries in Oman were examined via Structural Equation Modeling. The findings reveal that GPIP positively affects GCC, indicating that firms excelling in green product innovation enhance their strategic environmental capabilities. Conversely, GPcIP does not significantly impact GCC, suggesting that process innovations may need integration with broader strategies to influence core competencies effectively. GCC positively influences Green R&amp;D Investments, showing that firms with solid environmental capabilities are more likely to finance sustainable innovation. Moreover, Trust in Government (TG) and Satisfaction with Sustainability Government Policies (SWGM) significantly moderate the relationships between GPIP, GPcIP, GCC, and Green R&amp;D Investments. High levels of trust and satisfaction amplify these positive effects, highlighting the crucial role of a supportive institutional environment in fostering sustainable innovation. The study contributes to theoretical frameworks by integrating internal capabilities with external institutional factors within the context of sustainability, thereby bridging gaps between Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory. Practically, it suggests that firms should focus on green product innovation and develop GCC, while policymakers should foster trust and satisfaction through transparent and supportive policies to encourage green R&amp;D investments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how green innovation practices influence organizational capabilities and investments in sustainability within Omani firms. Grounded in Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory, it explores the relationship between Green Product Innovation Performance (GPIP), Green Process Innovation Performance (GPcIP), Green Core Competence (GCC), and Green Research and Development (R&D) Investments. Data collected from 214 top management personnel across diverse industries in Oman were examined via Structural Equation Modeling. The findings reveal that GPIP positively affects GCC, indicating that firms excelling in green product innovation enhance their strategic environmental capabilities. Conversely, GPcIP does not significantly impact GCC, suggesting that process innovations may need integration with broader strategies to influence core competencies effectively. GCC positively influences Green R&D Investments, showing that firms with solid environmental capabilities are more likely to finance sustainable innovation. Moreover, Trust in Government (TG) and Satisfaction with Sustainability Government Policies (SWGM) significantly moderate the relationships between GPIP, GPcIP, GCC, and Green R&D Investments. High levels of trust and satisfaction amplify these positive effects, highlighting the crucial role of a supportive institutional environment in fostering sustainable innovation. The study contributes to theoretical frameworks by integrating internal capabilities with external institutional factors within the context of sustainability, thereby bridging gaps between Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory. Practically, it suggests that firms should focus on green product innovation and develop GCC, while policymakers should foster trust and satisfaction through transparent and supportive policies to encourage green R&D investments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信