Are healthy diets also sustainable? Experimental study using a Fake Food Buffet

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mirna Al Masri , Laura M. König
{"title":"Are healthy diets also sustainable? Experimental study using a Fake Food Buffet","authors":"Mirna Al Masri ,&nbsp;Laura M. König","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interventions to promote healthy and sustainable diets are urgently needed to curb growing obesity rates and greenhouse gas emissions. To date, little is known about consumers' awareness of the co-benefits of healthy and sustainable diets. Studies furthermore lack a global perspective. This study therefore aimed (1) to compare the composition of sustainable, healthy, and typical meals using an experimental Fake Food Buffet (FFB) study and (2) to compare sustainable diet knowledge and perceptions between individuals who grow up in Global North and Global South countries. The experiment used a 3 <em>Meal Type</em> x 2 <em>Region</em> mixed design. Participants (<em>N</em> = 74), of which half grew up in the Global North and South, respectively, were asked to self-serve three meals (typical, healthy, sustainable) from the FFB and to complete the Food Sustainability Knowledge Questionnaire (FSKQ). Sustainable meals contained more vegetables, grains, legumes, and plant-based protein (<em>Fs</em>[2, 144] <em>≥</em> 4.26, <em>p</em>s <em>≤</em> .016), and less red meat, animal-based protein, and sugar than healthy or typical meals (<em>F</em>s[2, 144] <em>≥</em> 11.77 <em>p</em>s <em>≤</em> .001). FSKQ scores did not differ between regions (<em>W</em>[71.82] = 0.58, <em>p</em> = .564). However, participants from the Global North self-served more vegetables, grains, and plant-based protein from the FFB compared to participants from the Global South (<em>F</em>s[2, 72] ≥ 4.89 <em>p</em>s ≤ .003). Many people are not fully aware of the substantial overlap of healthy and sustainable diets. Furthermore, culture influences food choices and thus needs to be considered when designing and implementing dietary interventions on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400291X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions to promote healthy and sustainable diets are urgently needed to curb growing obesity rates and greenhouse gas emissions. To date, little is known about consumers' awareness of the co-benefits of healthy and sustainable diets. Studies furthermore lack a global perspective. This study therefore aimed (1) to compare the composition of sustainable, healthy, and typical meals using an experimental Fake Food Buffet (FFB) study and (2) to compare sustainable diet knowledge and perceptions between individuals who grow up in Global North and Global South countries. The experiment used a 3 Meal Type x 2 Region mixed design. Participants (N = 74), of which half grew up in the Global North and South, respectively, were asked to self-serve three meals (typical, healthy, sustainable) from the FFB and to complete the Food Sustainability Knowledge Questionnaire (FSKQ). Sustainable meals contained more vegetables, grains, legumes, and plant-based protein (Fs[2, 144]  4.26, p .016), and less red meat, animal-based protein, and sugar than healthy or typical meals (Fs[2, 144]  11.77 p .001). FSKQ scores did not differ between regions (W[71.82] = 0.58, p = .564). However, participants from the Global North self-served more vegetables, grains, and plant-based protein from the FFB compared to participants from the Global South (Fs[2, 72] ≥ 4.89 ps ≤ .003). Many people are not fully aware of the substantial overlap of healthy and sustainable diets. Furthermore, culture influences food choices and thus needs to be considered when designing and implementing dietary interventions on a global scale.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信