Sustainability reporting in sub-Sharan Africa: Does audit committee diversity and executive compensation matter?

Elias Mwasambu Lewa , Karambu Kiende Gatimbu , Peter Wang'ombe Kariuki
{"title":"Sustainability reporting in sub-Sharan Africa: Does audit committee diversity and executive compensation matter?","authors":"Elias Mwasambu Lewa ,&nbsp;Karambu Kiende Gatimbu ,&nbsp;Peter Wang'ombe Kariuki","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change is a critical global issue that impacts the modern corporate world. Shareholders and stakeholders increasingly demand corporate responsibility, especially due to increasing global resource depletion. Sustainability reporting varies significantly from region to region, with emerging markets facing greater challenges. The lack of synergy between nations and the lack of harmonized corporate reporting hinders efforts to address these issues. Using a multivariate regression model, the study assessed 101 non-financial companies listed in ten sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries from 2016 to 2021. The data was extracted from the study period's audited annual and stand-alone sustainability reports. The influence of audit committee characteristics on social, environmental, economic and disclosure of composite sustainability reporting was assessed. Empirical findings indicate that audit committee independence has a positive effect on sustainability reporting, while the director compensation ratio has a negative effect on it. The result provides policy insights into sustainability disclosure levels in SSA and highlights the need for more independent audit committees. Additionally, it is recommended that executive compensation be aligned with sustainability performance metrics to improve the control and credibility of sustainability disclosures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is a critical global issue that impacts the modern corporate world. Shareholders and stakeholders increasingly demand corporate responsibility, especially due to increasing global resource depletion. Sustainability reporting varies significantly from region to region, with emerging markets facing greater challenges. The lack of synergy between nations and the lack of harmonized corporate reporting hinders efforts to address these issues. Using a multivariate regression model, the study assessed 101 non-financial companies listed in ten sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries from 2016 to 2021. The data was extracted from the study period's audited annual and stand-alone sustainability reports. The influence of audit committee characteristics on social, environmental, economic and disclosure of composite sustainability reporting was assessed. Empirical findings indicate that audit committee independence has a positive effect on sustainability reporting, while the director compensation ratio has a negative effect on it. The result provides policy insights into sustainability disclosure levels in SSA and highlights the need for more independent audit committees. Additionally, it is recommended that executive compensation be aligned with sustainability performance metrics to improve the control and credibility of sustainability disclosures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信