Bridging the scales within transport-coupled kinetic models for heterogeneous electrocatalysis

IF 7.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Hemanth S. Pillai, Hendrik H. Heenen, Karsten Reuter, Vanessa J. Bukas
{"title":"Bridging the scales within transport-coupled kinetic models for heterogeneous electrocatalysis","authors":"Hemanth S. Pillai,&nbsp;Hendrik H. Heenen,&nbsp;Karsten Reuter,&nbsp;Vanessa J. Bukas","doi":"10.1016/j.coelec.2024.101631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing reaction rates in heterogeneous electrocatalysis requires a solid, fundamental understanding of the interplay between mass transport and the intrinsic reaction kinetics at the electrode surface. As these processes occur on disparate scales, however, bridging the two into a (single) comprehensive reaction model is a challenging task and active area of research. In this perspective, we give a current overview of transport-coupled kinetic models while making a distinction between those that describe the surface reaction <em>via</em> an effective phenomenological or first-principle-based kinetic model. This choice tends to be accompanied by a correspondingly more or less elaborate inclusion of mass transport. The two modeling approaches thus generally differ in the scientific questions that they aim to answer; whether focusing on elaborate transport effects and resulting design rules at the device level or more detailed mechanistic insight on a microscopic scale. We first discuss these approaches separately, including their pros and cons through notable studies in the existing literature and conclude with an outlook view on combining the value of both in future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11028,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Electrochemistry","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101631"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Electrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451910324001923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing reaction rates in heterogeneous electrocatalysis requires a solid, fundamental understanding of the interplay between mass transport and the intrinsic reaction kinetics at the electrode surface. As these processes occur on disparate scales, however, bridging the two into a (single) comprehensive reaction model is a challenging task and active area of research. In this perspective, we give a current overview of transport-coupled kinetic models while making a distinction between those that describe the surface reaction via an effective phenomenological or first-principle-based kinetic model. This choice tends to be accompanied by a correspondingly more or less elaborate inclusion of mass transport. The two modeling approaches thus generally differ in the scientific questions that they aim to answer; whether focusing on elaborate transport effects and resulting design rules at the device level or more detailed mechanistic insight on a microscopic scale. We first discuss these approaches separately, including their pros and cons through notable studies in the existing literature and conclude with an outlook view on combining the value of both in future research.
在多相电催化的输运耦合动力学模型中架起桥梁
优化多相电催化的反应速率需要对电极表面的质量传递和本征反应动力学之间的相互作用有扎实的、基本的理解。然而,由于这些过程发生在不同的尺度上,将两者连接成一个(单一的)综合反应模型是一项具有挑战性的任务和活跃的研究领域。从这个角度来看,我们给出了当前传输耦合动力学模型的概述,同时对那些通过有效的现象学或基于第一性原理的动力学模型来描述表面反应的模型进行了区分。这种选择往往伴随着相应的或多或少复杂的大众运输。因此,这两种建模方法在它们旨在回答的科学问题上通常不同;无论是专注于在设备层面上详细的传输效应和由此产生的设计规则,还是在微观尺度上更详细的机制洞察。我们首先分别讨论了这些方法,通过现有文献中值得注意的研究,包括它们的优点和缺点,最后展望了在未来的研究中结合两者的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
272
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: The development of the Current Opinion journals stemmed from the acknowledgment of the growing challenge for specialists to stay abreast of the expanding volume of information within their field. In Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, they help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: 1.The views of experts on current advances in electrochemistry in a clear and readable form. 2.Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications. In the realm of electrochemistry, the subject is divided into 12 themed sections, with each section undergoing an annual review cycle: • Bioelectrochemistry • Electrocatalysis • Electrochemical Materials and Engineering • Energy Storage: Batteries and Supercapacitors • Energy Transformation • Environmental Electrochemistry • Fundamental & Theoretical Electrochemistry • Innovative Methods in Electrochemistry • Organic & Molecular Electrochemistry • Physical & Nano-Electrochemistry • Sensors & Bio-sensors •
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信