Influence of blockage ratios in shaping wind dynamics in urban environments

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Geng Tian , Dingyang Geng , Liangzhu (Leon) Wang , Theodore (Ted) Stathopoulos , Minping Wan , Shiyi Chen
{"title":"Influence of blockage ratios in shaping wind dynamics in urban environments","authors":"Geng Tian ,&nbsp;Dingyang Geng ,&nbsp;Liangzhu (Leon) Wang ,&nbsp;Theodore (Ted) Stathopoulos ,&nbsp;Minping Wan ,&nbsp;Shiyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analytical urban canopy models (UCMs) based on Prandtl’s mixing length theory usually ignore the blockage effects caused by building structures, which greatly reduces their accuracy in representing wind flow and turbulence variations within urban boundary layers. This study employs large-eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric stratification to investigate the effects of various blockage ratios on wind dynamics in urban environments. Detailed analyses are conducted on variations in instantaneous flow fields, mean velocity, Reynolds shear stress, and vorticity around buildings. Results indicate that higher blockage ratios restrict airflow above buildings, leading to increased local wind speeds and intensified turbulence within the urban canopy layer. In contrast, lower blockage ratios allow smoother airflow over the canopy, minimizing interactions between the airflow and buildings. Vorticity analysis suggests that higher blockage ratios induce smaller, denser vortices in the wake region, while lower blockage ratios generate longer, more dispersed vortices near the rooftop. Furthermore, this study introduces a modified friction velocity that reduces the bias in velocity by about 17% at a low blockage ratio of 4.44%, resulting in a more accurate representation of the velocity distribution around buildings. As a result, for neutral stratification at a specific moment, known parameters such as atmospheric boundary layer height can be used to predict velocity without additional simulations, thus significantly reducing the computational costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 106008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525000042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical urban canopy models (UCMs) based on Prandtl’s mixing length theory usually ignore the blockage effects caused by building structures, which greatly reduces their accuracy in representing wind flow and turbulence variations within urban boundary layers. This study employs large-eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric stratification to investigate the effects of various blockage ratios on wind dynamics in urban environments. Detailed analyses are conducted on variations in instantaneous flow fields, mean velocity, Reynolds shear stress, and vorticity around buildings. Results indicate that higher blockage ratios restrict airflow above buildings, leading to increased local wind speeds and intensified turbulence within the urban canopy layer. In contrast, lower blockage ratios allow smoother airflow over the canopy, minimizing interactions between the airflow and buildings. Vorticity analysis suggests that higher blockage ratios induce smaller, denser vortices in the wake region, while lower blockage ratios generate longer, more dispersed vortices near the rooftop. Furthermore, this study introduces a modified friction velocity that reduces the bias in velocity by about 17% at a low blockage ratio of 4.44%, resulting in a more accurate representation of the velocity distribution around buildings. As a result, for neutral stratification at a specific moment, known parameters such as atmospheric boundary layer height can be used to predict velocity without additional simulations, thus significantly reducing the computational costs.
城市环境中堵塞率对形成风动力的影响
基于Prandtl混合长度理论的分析型城市冠层模型通常忽略了建筑结构的阻塞效应,这极大地降低了其表征城市边界层内风流和湍流变化的准确性。本研究采用中性大气分层条件下的大涡模拟研究了不同阻塞比对城市环境中风动力的影响。详细分析了建筑物周围瞬时流场、平均速度、雷诺剪应力和涡度的变化。结果表明,较高的阻塞比限制了建筑物上方的气流,导致局地风速增加,城市冠层内部湍流加剧。相比之下,较低的堵塞比允许更顺畅的气流通过顶篷,最大限度地减少气流和建筑物之间的相互作用。涡度分析表明,较高的堵塞比在尾迹区域产生较小、较密集的涡,而较低的堵塞比在屋顶附近产生较长、较分散的涡。此外,本研究引入了一个修正的摩擦速度,在4.44%的低堵塞比下,将速度偏差降低了约17%,从而更准确地表示了建筑物周围的速度分布。因此,对于特定时刻的中性分层,可以使用已知参数(如大气边界层高度)来预测速度,而无需额外的模拟,从而大大降低了计算成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信