George Amenchwi Amahnui, Marth Vanegas, Louis Verchot, Augusto Castro-Nunez
{"title":"Achieving the paris agreement goals by transitioning to low-emissions food systems: A comprehensive review of countries’ actions","authors":"George Amenchwi Amahnui, Marth Vanegas, Louis Verchot, Augusto Castro-Nunez","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meeting the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target requires ambitious strategies to transition to low-emissions food systems. This study aimed to identify strategies for reducing food-system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), including their co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities for implementation applied by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Annex I and non-Annex I countries. The study was based on a systematic Scopus database literature review of peer-reviewed papers. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse) methodology was used to identify, assess, and select 201 articles related to our research questions. We analyzed data by identifying GHGE-reduction strategies reported for four food-system levels (pre-production, production, supply chain, and consumption) across Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Our findings show that 65 % of the articles published results for Annex I, 19 % for non-Annex I, and 16 % for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries, indicating that food-system GHGE-reduction has gained more attention in Annex I than in non-annex I countries. Among the 94 GHGE-reduction strategies identified applicable to the four food-system levels, dietary changes, such as reducing red meat consumption and restricting 'forest-risk' agricultural commodities were the most reported, particularly in the Global North. The supply-chain level reported the highest number of GHGE-reduction strategies (38), while the pre-production level recorded the lowest (2). The co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities associated with the GHGE-reduction measures presented were underreported. We conclude that, with increased economic growth, increasing urban populations, and a rising middle class in non-Annex I countries, Annex I GHGE-reduction strategies could also be promoted in non-annex I countries across the Global South or serve as a springboard for those countries that have yet to apply a food-system GHGE-reduction approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103968"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124003022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Meeting the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target requires ambitious strategies to transition to low-emissions food systems. This study aimed to identify strategies for reducing food-system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), including their co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities for implementation applied by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Annex I and non-Annex I countries. The study was based on a systematic Scopus database literature review of peer-reviewed papers. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse) methodology was used to identify, assess, and select 201 articles related to our research questions. We analyzed data by identifying GHGE-reduction strategies reported for four food-system levels (pre-production, production, supply chain, and consumption) across Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Our findings show that 65 % of the articles published results for Annex I, 19 % for non-Annex I, and 16 % for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries, indicating that food-system GHGE-reduction has gained more attention in Annex I than in non-annex I countries. Among the 94 GHGE-reduction strategies identified applicable to the four food-system levels, dietary changes, such as reducing red meat consumption and restricting 'forest-risk' agricultural commodities were the most reported, particularly in the Global North. The supply-chain level reported the highest number of GHGE-reduction strategies (38), while the pre-production level recorded the lowest (2). The co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities associated with the GHGE-reduction measures presented were underreported. We conclude that, with increased economic growth, increasing urban populations, and a rising middle class in non-Annex I countries, Annex I GHGE-reduction strategies could also be promoted in non-annex I countries across the Global South or serve as a springboard for those countries that have yet to apply a food-system GHGE-reduction approach.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.