Achieving the paris agreement goals by transitioning to low-emissions food systems: A comprehensive review of countries’ actions

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
George Amenchwi Amahnui, Marth Vanegas, Louis Verchot, Augusto Castro-Nunez
{"title":"Achieving the paris agreement goals by transitioning to low-emissions food systems: A comprehensive review of countries’ actions","authors":"George Amenchwi Amahnui,&nbsp;Marth Vanegas,&nbsp;Louis Verchot,&nbsp;Augusto Castro-Nunez","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meeting the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target requires ambitious strategies to transition to low-emissions food systems. This study aimed to identify strategies for reducing food-system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), including their co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities for implementation applied by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Annex I and non-Annex I countries. The study was based on a systematic Scopus database literature review of peer-reviewed papers. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse) methodology was used to identify, assess, and select 201 articles related to our research questions. We analyzed data by identifying GHGE-reduction strategies reported for four food-system levels (pre-production, production, supply chain, and consumption) across Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Our findings show that 65 % of the articles published results for Annex I, 19 % for non-Annex I, and 16 % for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries, indicating that food-system GHGE-reduction has gained more attention in Annex I than in non-annex I countries. Among the 94 GHGE-reduction strategies identified applicable to the four food-system levels, dietary changes, such as reducing red meat consumption and restricting 'forest-risk' agricultural commodities were the most reported, particularly in the Global North. The supply-chain level reported the highest number of GHGE-reduction strategies (38), while the pre-production level recorded the lowest (2). The co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities associated with the GHGE-reduction measures presented were underreported. We conclude that, with increased economic growth, increasing urban populations, and a rising middle class in non-Annex I countries, Annex I GHGE-reduction strategies could also be promoted in non-annex I countries across the Global South or serve as a springboard for those countries that have yet to apply a food-system GHGE-reduction approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103968"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124003022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meeting the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target requires ambitious strategies to transition to low-emissions food systems. This study aimed to identify strategies for reducing food-system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), including their co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities for implementation applied by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Annex I and non-Annex I countries. The study was based on a systematic Scopus database literature review of peer-reviewed papers. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse) methodology was used to identify, assess, and select 201 articles related to our research questions. We analyzed data by identifying GHGE-reduction strategies reported for four food-system levels (pre-production, production, supply chain, and consumption) across Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Our findings show that 65 % of the articles published results for Annex I, 19 % for non-Annex I, and 16 % for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries, indicating that food-system GHGE-reduction has gained more attention in Annex I than in non-annex I countries. Among the 94 GHGE-reduction strategies identified applicable to the four food-system levels, dietary changes, such as reducing red meat consumption and restricting 'forest-risk' agricultural commodities were the most reported, particularly in the Global North. The supply-chain level reported the highest number of GHGE-reduction strategies (38), while the pre-production level recorded the lowest (2). The co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities associated with the GHGE-reduction measures presented were underreported. We conclude that, with increased economic growth, increasing urban populations, and a rising middle class in non-Annex I countries, Annex I GHGE-reduction strategies could also be promoted in non-annex I countries across the Global South or serve as a springboard for those countries that have yet to apply a food-system GHGE-reduction approach.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信