Acceptability of plastic policies: Cross-cultural insights on social norms and trust

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lina Hertzberg , Magnus Bergquist , Olorondu Winner Obianuju , Andreas Nilsson
{"title":"Acceptability of plastic policies: Cross-cultural insights on social norms and trust","authors":"Lina Hertzberg ,&nbsp;Magnus Bergquist ,&nbsp;Olorondu Winner Obianuju ,&nbsp;Andreas Nilsson","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Annually, millions of tons of plastic waste end up in rivers and the oceans, obstructing the surrounding ecosystems and resulting in substantial environmental degradation, as well as unforeseeable negative consequences for several species, including humans. In tackling this plastics crisis, the United Nations Environmental Assembly has decided to draft international legally binding instruments targeting the manufacture and use of problematic types of plastic waste. The implementation of plastic policies is considered a key component in tackling the ongoing plastic crisis and, with this, prevent future catastrophic consequences on the ecosystem caused by plastic pollution. Nevertheless, people’s willingness to accept these policies is paramount in achieving the intended goal. In this study, we examined social norms, institutional trust, and generalized trust as predictors of the acceptability of plastic policies in Sweden (<em>N</em> = 2006) and Brazil (<em>N</em> = 2002). Multiple hierarchical regression analyses showed that institutional trust, generalized trust, and social norms positively predicted acceptance in both countries. Consistent across countries, we found that social norms explained a noticeably larger proportion of the variance in acceptability than both institutional trust and generalized trust. These results advance past research on policy acceptability by a) assessing acceptability of a plastic policy, b) providing cross-cultural data, and c) showing that the well-studied determinant trust was less influential than the less-studied determinant social norms. These results stress the role of social norms, both for future research and for practical applications, encouraging further study on how social norms can be implemented to encourage acceptability of environmental policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103958"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Annually, millions of tons of plastic waste end up in rivers and the oceans, obstructing the surrounding ecosystems and resulting in substantial environmental degradation, as well as unforeseeable negative consequences for several species, including humans. In tackling this plastics crisis, the United Nations Environmental Assembly has decided to draft international legally binding instruments targeting the manufacture and use of problematic types of plastic waste. The implementation of plastic policies is considered a key component in tackling the ongoing plastic crisis and, with this, prevent future catastrophic consequences on the ecosystem caused by plastic pollution. Nevertheless, people’s willingness to accept these policies is paramount in achieving the intended goal. In this study, we examined social norms, institutional trust, and generalized trust as predictors of the acceptability of plastic policies in Sweden (N = 2006) and Brazil (N = 2002). Multiple hierarchical regression analyses showed that institutional trust, generalized trust, and social norms positively predicted acceptance in both countries. Consistent across countries, we found that social norms explained a noticeably larger proportion of the variance in acceptability than both institutional trust and generalized trust. These results advance past research on policy acceptability by a) assessing acceptability of a plastic policy, b) providing cross-cultural data, and c) showing that the well-studied determinant trust was less influential than the less-studied determinant social norms. These results stress the role of social norms, both for future research and for practical applications, encouraging further study on how social norms can be implemented to encourage acceptability of environmental policies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信