Impacts of limited fuel choices in Syrian refugee camps: A mixed-methods investigation into household energy practices and indoor air pollution

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Sohayb Abdulkerim , Abir Nasır , Ghada Alymany , Monica Mateo-Garcia , Neil Simcock
{"title":"Impacts of limited fuel choices in Syrian refugee camps: A mixed-methods investigation into household energy practices and indoor air pollution","authors":"Sohayb Abdulkerim ,&nbsp;Abir Nasır ,&nbsp;Ghada Alymany ,&nbsp;Monica Mateo-Garcia ,&nbsp;Neil Simcock","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates household fuel use, and its potential impacts on household energy practices and indoor air pollution in Syrian refugee camps. It covers the challenges faced by over a million displaced Syrians in 1293 refugee camps, focusing on the scarcity of fuels for heating and cooking and the consequent health risks due to indoor air pollution. A mixed methods approach was utilized, combining questionnaires from a sample of 439 participants, 75 % of them displaced, indoor air quality monitoring across 14 dwellings and in-depth interviews from 20 homes. The houses monitored were a mixture of apartments, tents, stone cement and containers; with fuel types ranging from diesel, coal and LPG to wood, olive husk and nut shells. The analysis reveals a significant correlation between the use of solid fuels in households and lack of ventilation with the increase in indoor air pollution, with maximum PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations above 114 μg/m<sup>3</sup> and maximum TVOC concentrations above 1200 ppb, well above recommended threshold values. This is supported by 36 % of participants reporting health issues, highlighting substantial health risks associated with these practices. It also demonstrates the influence of dwelling typology and ventilation in thermal comfort and indoor air pollution, with containers performing the worst, reaching maximum CO<sub>2</sub> levels above 5000 ppb. The paper underscores the pressing need for improved energy solutions and better quality of homes in refugee camps to enhance living conditions and reduce health hazards. The research provides valuable insights into the intersection of energy use, environmental conditions, and human health in conflict-affected and resource-limited settings, offering a foundation for informed policy-making and targeted interventions to improve living conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624002667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates household fuel use, and its potential impacts on household energy practices and indoor air pollution in Syrian refugee camps. It covers the challenges faced by over a million displaced Syrians in 1293 refugee camps, focusing on the scarcity of fuels for heating and cooking and the consequent health risks due to indoor air pollution. A mixed methods approach was utilized, combining questionnaires from a sample of 439 participants, 75 % of them displaced, indoor air quality monitoring across 14 dwellings and in-depth interviews from 20 homes. The houses monitored were a mixture of apartments, tents, stone cement and containers; with fuel types ranging from diesel, coal and LPG to wood, olive husk and nut shells. The analysis reveals a significant correlation between the use of solid fuels in households and lack of ventilation with the increase in indoor air pollution, with maximum PM2.5 concentrations above 114 μg/m3 and maximum TVOC concentrations above 1200 ppb, well above recommended threshold values. This is supported by 36 % of participants reporting health issues, highlighting substantial health risks associated with these practices. It also demonstrates the influence of dwelling typology and ventilation in thermal comfort and indoor air pollution, with containers performing the worst, reaching maximum CO2 levels above 5000 ppb. The paper underscores the pressing need for improved energy solutions and better quality of homes in refugee camps to enhance living conditions and reduce health hazards. The research provides valuable insights into the intersection of energy use, environmental conditions, and human health in conflict-affected and resource-limited settings, offering a foundation for informed policy-making and targeted interventions to improve living conditions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信