Security analysis of ethylene glycol production pathways

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Jinqiang Liang , Danzhu Liu , Xunming Su , Xiaoling Xu , Yong Yi , Shuliang Xu , Mao Ye
{"title":"Security analysis of ethylene glycol production pathways","authors":"Jinqiang Liang ,&nbsp;Danzhu Liu ,&nbsp;Xunming Su ,&nbsp;Xiaoling Xu ,&nbsp;Yong Yi ,&nbsp;Shuliang Xu ,&nbsp;Mao Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the production process of ethylene glycol (EG), which is considered a crucial basic chemical material, China's energy consumption and carbon emissions are greatly affected. This study examines seven different routes for EG production, focusing on their security implications. To evaluate the security of these production routes, a framework is proposed that considers various aspects of the chemical industry chain involved in EG production. The evaluation is conducted across five dimensions, namely the raw materials, technology, economics, environment, and energy consumption. The results show that CTEG and BTEG processes have advantage of high security performance in the raw materials scenario (R-Scenario). Corresponding, CTEG-2 and BTEG-1 routes have advantage of high security performance in the technology scenario (T-Scenario). NTEG and BTEG routes should be adopted according to environment scenario (E-Scenario). In the cost scenario (C-Scenario) and energy consumption scenario (EC-Scenario), OTEG and NTEG routes have the benefit of superior security capabilities because much better economic performance and low energy consumption compared with other routes. The findings of this study serve as a crucial foundation for enhancing the manufacturing process of EG. Additionally, it aids decision makers in selecting the most appropriate production method for EG, taking into account the prevailing circumstances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"214 ","pages":"Pages 65-77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876224007032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the production process of ethylene glycol (EG), which is considered a crucial basic chemical material, China's energy consumption and carbon emissions are greatly affected. This study examines seven different routes for EG production, focusing on their security implications. To evaluate the security of these production routes, a framework is proposed that considers various aspects of the chemical industry chain involved in EG production. The evaluation is conducted across five dimensions, namely the raw materials, technology, economics, environment, and energy consumption. The results show that CTEG and BTEG processes have advantage of high security performance in the raw materials scenario (R-Scenario). Corresponding, CTEG-2 and BTEG-1 routes have advantage of high security performance in the technology scenario (T-Scenario). NTEG and BTEG routes should be adopted according to environment scenario (E-Scenario). In the cost scenario (C-Scenario) and energy consumption scenario (EC-Scenario), OTEG and NTEG routes have the benefit of superior security capabilities because much better economic performance and low energy consumption compared with other routes. The findings of this study serve as a crucial foundation for enhancing the manufacturing process of EG. Additionally, it aids decision makers in selecting the most appropriate production method for EG, taking into account the prevailing circumstances.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Research & Design
Chemical Engineering Research & Design 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
623
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering. Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信