Composite cardiovascular risk factor control in US adults with diabetes and relation to social determinants of health: The All of Us research program

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frances Golden, Johnathan Tran, Nathan D. Wong
{"title":"Composite cardiovascular risk factor control in US adults with diabetes and relation to social determinants of health: The All of Us research program","authors":"Frances Golden,&nbsp;Johnathan Tran,&nbsp;Nathan D. Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Data are limited on composite cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aims to identify disparities in cardiovascular risk factor control based on most recent recommendations and relationships to social determinants of health in a large-scale real-world cohort of US adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from 88,416 participants with T2DM in the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative <em>All of Us</em> Research Program 2018–2022. We investigated the management of five key cardiovascular risk factors—glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), and smoking status. Statistical methods included Chi-square tests for categorical comparisons, <em>t</em>-tests for mean differences, and multiple logistic regression to assess the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on risk factor control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed low risk factor control with only 27.7 % of participants achieving recommended levels for three or more risk factors (RFs) and 4.9 % for four or more RFs. Overall, while 81.0% were at target for HbA1c, only 37.9% were at target for BP and 10.4% for LDL-C. Notably, only 1.9 % and 6.9 % were at target for HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP together, based on current and prior recommendations, respectively. Significant disparities were observed across race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic lines with 43.1 % of Asian participants at control for ≥3 RFs compared to 21.1 % of non-Hispanic black participants. In logistic regression analysis, factors such as higher income, higher educational attainment, and health insurance were associated with better RF control, while higher polysocial risk scores linked to poorer control.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite some progress in managing individual CVD risk factors in T2DM, overall composite risk factor control remains poor, especially among underrepresented and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. The findings highlight the necessity for integrated healthcare strategies that address both medical and social needs to improve control of CVD risk factors and outcomes in T2DM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Data are limited on composite cardiovascular risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aims to identify disparities in cardiovascular risk factor control based on most recent recommendations and relationships to social determinants of health in a large-scale real-world cohort of US adults.

Methods

We analyzed data from 88,416 participants with T2DM in the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program 2018–2022. We investigated the management of five key cardiovascular risk factors—glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), and smoking status. Statistical methods included Chi-square tests for categorical comparisons, t-tests for mean differences, and multiple logistic regression to assess the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on risk factor control.

Results

The study revealed low risk factor control with only 27.7 % of participants achieving recommended levels for three or more risk factors (RFs) and 4.9 % for four or more RFs. Overall, while 81.0% were at target for HbA1c, only 37.9% were at target for BP and 10.4% for LDL-C. Notably, only 1.9 % and 6.9 % were at target for HbA1c, LDL-C, and BP together, based on current and prior recommendations, respectively. Significant disparities were observed across race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic lines with 43.1 % of Asian participants at control for ≥3 RFs compared to 21.1 % of non-Hispanic black participants. In logistic regression analysis, factors such as higher income, higher educational attainment, and health insurance were associated with better RF control, while higher polysocial risk scores linked to poorer control.

Conclusions

Despite some progress in managing individual CVD risk factors in T2DM, overall composite risk factor control remains poor, especially among underrepresented and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. The findings highlight the necessity for integrated healthcare strategies that address both medical and social needs to improve control of CVD risk factors and outcomes in T2DM.

Abstract Image

综合心血管危险因素控制在美国成人糖尿病患者和关系到健康的社会决定因素:我们所有人的研究计划
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者复合心血管危险因素控制方面的数据有限。本研究旨在根据最近的建议确定心血管危险因素控制的差异,并在美国成年人的大规模现实世界队列中确定与健康的社会决定因素的关系。方法:我们分析了2018-2022年美国国立卫生研究院精准医学倡议“我们所有人”研究计划中88,416名T2DM患者的数据。我们调查了五个关键心血管危险因素的管理:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL- c)、体重指数(BMI)、血压(BP)和吸烟状况。统计方法包括卡方检验进行分类比较,t检验进行均值差异检验,多元逻辑回归评估人口统计学和社会经济因素对危险因素控制的影响。结果研究显示风险因素控制较低,只有27.7%的参与者达到了三个或更多风险因素(RFs)的推荐水平,4.9%的参与者达到了四个或更多风险因素(RFs)的推荐水平。总体而言,81.0%的患者HbA1c达标,而仅有37.9%的患者BP达标,10.4%的患者LDL-C达标。值得注意的是,根据目前和以前的建议,HbA1c、LDL-C和BP分别只有1.9%和6.9%达到目标。在种族/民族、性别和社会经济方面观察到显著的差异,43.1%的亚洲参与者处于≥3次RFs的对照组,而非西班牙裔黑人参与者为21.1%。在logistic回归分析中,较高的收入、较高的教育程度和健康保险等因素与较好的射频控制有关,而较高的多社会风险评分与较差的控制有关。结论:尽管在T2DM患者个体CVD危险因素管理方面取得了一些进展,但总体复合危险因素控制仍然很差,特别是在代表性不足和社会经济弱势群体中。研究结果强调了综合医疗保健策略的必要性,以解决医疗和社会需求,以改善对2型糖尿病心血管疾病危险因素和结果的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信