Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques

Adegboyega Bolu Ehinmowo, Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri, Joseph Oluwatobi Olaide
{"title":"Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques","authors":"Adegboyega Bolu Ehinmowo,&nbsp;Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri,&nbsp;Joseph Oluwatobi Olaide","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for cleaner and more efficient energy solutions has necessitated the development of biomass conversion techniques for hydrogen production. Thermocatalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon directly from methane without CO₂ emission. However, there is the need to optimise this process for better efficiency and improved hydrogen production from biomass sources. In this study, the integration of various machine learning algorithms with Bayesian optimisation, firefly algorithm, Levenberg-Marquardt, and differential evolution techniques were investigated for hydrogen production via thermocatalytic methane decomposition. The key process parameters studied include calcination temperature (450–600<!--> <!-->°C), time of calcination (3–8 h), specific surface area (5.4–249 m²/g), and pore volume (0.03–0.48 cm³/g); reduction temperature (500–700<!--> <!-->°C), time of reduction (1–5 h), and catalyst weight (0.05–1.00 g). The Bayesian-optimized CatBoost regressor model, with an R² of 96.3% and an RMSE of 0.064 showed the best performance. For the prediction of methane conversion, the Support Vector Regressor (SVR) model optimised with Firefly showed the best performance among other models with an R² value of 95.5% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.070. CatBoost regressor predicted hydrogen yield of 87% close to the actual yield of 86%. The predicted methane conversion using the firefly-optimized support vector machine regressor was 72%, with the actual conversion being 68%. Model-to-feature relationship studies showed that catalyst weight and calcination time were the strongest predictors of hydrogen yield and methane conversion volume. The study hence established the great opportunity of integration of machine learning models with optimisation techniques in attempts to improve the prediction of hydrogen yield and methane conversion in processes for hydrogen production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X24001340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for cleaner and more efficient energy solutions has necessitated the development of biomass conversion techniques for hydrogen production. Thermocatalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon directly from methane without CO₂ emission. However, there is the need to optimise this process for better efficiency and improved hydrogen production from biomass sources. In this study, the integration of various machine learning algorithms with Bayesian optimisation, firefly algorithm, Levenberg-Marquardt, and differential evolution techniques were investigated for hydrogen production via thermocatalytic methane decomposition. The key process parameters studied include calcination temperature (450–600 °C), time of calcination (3–8 h), specific surface area (5.4–249 m²/g), and pore volume (0.03–0.48 cm³/g); reduction temperature (500–700 °C), time of reduction (1–5 h), and catalyst weight (0.05–1.00 g). The Bayesian-optimized CatBoost regressor model, with an R² of 96.3% and an RMSE of 0.064 showed the best performance. For the prediction of methane conversion, the Support Vector Regressor (SVR) model optimised with Firefly showed the best performance among other models with an R² value of 95.5% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.070. CatBoost regressor predicted hydrogen yield of 87% close to the actual yield of 86%. The predicted methane conversion using the firefly-optimized support vector machine regressor was 72%, with the actual conversion being 68%. Model-to-feature relationship studies showed that catalyst weight and calcination time were the strongest predictors of hydrogen yield and methane conversion volume. The study hence established the great opportunity of integration of machine learning models with optimisation techniques in attempts to improve the prediction of hydrogen yield and methane conversion in processes for hydrogen production.
利用机器学习和优化技术对生物质衍生甲烷的产氢和甲烷转化进行预测建模
对更清洁和更有效的能源解决方案的需求日益增长,因此有必要开发用于制氢的生物质转化技术。热催化甲烷分解直接从甲烷中产生氢和固体碳,而不排放CO 2。然而,有必要优化这一过程,以提高效率和改进生物质资源的制氢。在这项研究中,研究了各种机器学习算法与贝叶斯优化、萤火虫算法、Levenberg-Marquardt和差分进化技术的集成,以通过热催化甲烷分解制氢。研究的关键工艺参数包括:煅烧温度(450 ~ 600℃)、煅烧时间(3 ~ 8 h)、比表面积(5.4 ~ 249 m²/g)、孔容(0.03 ~ 0.48 cm³/g);还原温度(500-700℃),还原时间(1-5 h),催化剂重量(0.05-1.00 g)。经贝叶斯优化的CatBoost回归模型表现最佳,R²为96.3%,RMSE为0.064。对于甲烷转化率的预测,使用Firefly优化的支持向量回归(SVR)模型的R²值为95.5%,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.070,在所有模型中表现最好。CatBoost回归预测的产氢率为87%,接近实际产氢率86%。利用萤火虫优化的支持向量机回归量预测的甲烷转化率为72%,实际转化率为68%。模型-特征关系研究表明,催化剂重量和煅烧时间是氢产率和甲烷转化率的最强预测因子。因此,该研究为机器学习模型与优化技术的集成提供了巨大的机会,试图改善氢气生产过程中氢气产量和甲烷转化的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信