Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques

Adegboyega Bolu Ehinmowo, Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri, Joseph Oluwatobi Olaide
{"title":"Predictive modeling of hydrogen production and methane conversion from biomass-derived methane using machine learning and optimisation techniques","authors":"Adegboyega Bolu Ehinmowo,&nbsp;Bright Ikechukwu Nwaneri,&nbsp;Joseph Oluwatobi Olaide","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for cleaner and more efficient energy solutions has necessitated the development of biomass conversion techniques for hydrogen production. Thermocatalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon directly from methane without CO₂ emission. However, there is the need to optimise this process for better efficiency and improved hydrogen production from biomass sources. In this study, the integration of various machine learning algorithms with Bayesian optimisation, firefly algorithm, Levenberg-Marquardt, and differential evolution techniques were investigated for hydrogen production via thermocatalytic methane decomposition. The key process parameters studied include calcination temperature (450–600<!--> <!-->°C), time of calcination (3–8 h), specific surface area (5.4–249 m²/g), and pore volume (0.03–0.48 cm³/g); reduction temperature (500–700<!--> <!-->°C), time of reduction (1–5 h), and catalyst weight (0.05–1.00 g). The Bayesian-optimized CatBoost regressor model, with an R² of 96.3% and an RMSE of 0.064 showed the best performance. For the prediction of methane conversion, the Support Vector Regressor (SVR) model optimised with Firefly showed the best performance among other models with an R² value of 95.5% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.070. CatBoost regressor predicted hydrogen yield of 87% close to the actual yield of 86%. The predicted methane conversion using the firefly-optimized support vector machine regressor was 72%, with the actual conversion being 68%. Model-to-feature relationship studies showed that catalyst weight and calcination time were the strongest predictors of hydrogen yield and methane conversion volume. The study hence established the great opportunity of integration of machine learning models with optimisation techniques in attempts to improve the prediction of hydrogen yield and methane conversion in processes for hydrogen production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X24001340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for cleaner and more efficient energy solutions has necessitated the development of biomass conversion techniques for hydrogen production. Thermocatalytic methane decomposition produces hydrogen and solid carbon directly from methane without CO₂ emission. However, there is the need to optimise this process for better efficiency and improved hydrogen production from biomass sources. In this study, the integration of various machine learning algorithms with Bayesian optimisation, firefly algorithm, Levenberg-Marquardt, and differential evolution techniques were investigated for hydrogen production via thermocatalytic methane decomposition. The key process parameters studied include calcination temperature (450–600 °C), time of calcination (3–8 h), specific surface area (5.4–249 m²/g), and pore volume (0.03–0.48 cm³/g); reduction temperature (500–700 °C), time of reduction (1–5 h), and catalyst weight (0.05–1.00 g). The Bayesian-optimized CatBoost regressor model, with an R² of 96.3% and an RMSE of 0.064 showed the best performance. For the prediction of methane conversion, the Support Vector Regressor (SVR) model optimised with Firefly showed the best performance among other models with an R² value of 95.5% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.070. CatBoost regressor predicted hydrogen yield of 87% close to the actual yield of 86%. The predicted methane conversion using the firefly-optimized support vector machine regressor was 72%, with the actual conversion being 68%. Model-to-feature relationship studies showed that catalyst weight and calcination time were the strongest predictors of hydrogen yield and methane conversion volume. The study hence established the great opportunity of integration of machine learning models with optimisation techniques in attempts to improve the prediction of hydrogen yield and methane conversion in processes for hydrogen production.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信