MRI and CT radiomics for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis

IF 2.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Caterina Tartari , Fabio Porões , Sabine Schmidt , Daniel Abler , Thomas Vetterli , Adrien Depeursinge , Clarisse Dromain , Naïk Vietti Violi , Mario Jreige
{"title":"MRI and CT radiomics for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis","authors":"Caterina Tartari ,&nbsp;Fabio Porões ,&nbsp;Sabine Schmidt ,&nbsp;Daniel Abler ,&nbsp;Thomas Vetterli ,&nbsp;Adrien Depeursinge ,&nbsp;Clarisse Dromain ,&nbsp;Naïk Vietti Violi ,&nbsp;Mario Jreige","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the single and combined diagnostic performances of CT and MRI radiomics for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We prospectively enrolled 78 patients (mean age 55.7 ± 17 years, 48.7 % male) diagnosed with AP between 2020 and 2022. Patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) within 48–72 h of symptoms and MRI ≤ 24 h after CECT. The entire pancreas was manually segmented tridimensionally by two operators on portal venous phase (PVP) CECT images, T2-weighted imaging (WI) MR sequence and non-enhanced and PVP T1-WI MR sequences. A matched control group (n = 77) with normal pancreas was used. Dataset was randomly split into training and test, and various machine learning algorithms were compared. Receiver operating curve analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The T2WI model exhibited significantly better diagnostic performance than CECT and non-enhanced and venous T1WI, with sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 73.3 % (95 % CI: 71.5–74.7), 80.1 % (78.2–83.2), and 0.834 (0.819–0.844) for T2WI (p = 0.001), 74.4 % (71.5–76.4), 58.7 % (56.3–61.1), and 0.654 (0.630–0.677) for non-enhanced T1WI, 62.1 % (60.1–64.2), 78.7 % (77.1–81), and 0.787 (0.771–0.810) for venous T1WI, and 66.4 % (64.8–50.9), 48.4 % (46–50.9), and 0.610 (0.586–0.626) for CECT, respectively.</div><div>The combination of T2WI with CECT enhanced diagnostic performance compared to T2WI, achieving sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 81.4 % (80–80.3), 78.1 % (75.9–80.2), and 0.911 (0.902–0.920) (p = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MRI radiomics outperformed the CT radiomics model to detect diagnosis of AP and the combination of MRI with CECT showed better performance than single models. The translation of radiomics into clinical practice may improve detection of AP, particularly MRI radiomics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the single and combined diagnostic performances of CT and MRI radiomics for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP).

Materials and methods

We prospectively enrolled 78 patients (mean age 55.7 ± 17 years, 48.7 % male) diagnosed with AP between 2020 and 2022. Patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) within 48–72 h of symptoms and MRI ≤ 24 h after CECT. The entire pancreas was manually segmented tridimensionally by two operators on portal venous phase (PVP) CECT images, T2-weighted imaging (WI) MR sequence and non-enhanced and PVP T1-WI MR sequences. A matched control group (n = 77) with normal pancreas was used. Dataset was randomly split into training and test, and various machine learning algorithms were compared. Receiver operating curve analysis was performed.

Results

The T2WI model exhibited significantly better diagnostic performance than CECT and non-enhanced and venous T1WI, with sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 73.3 % (95 % CI: 71.5–74.7), 80.1 % (78.2–83.2), and 0.834 (0.819–0.844) for T2WI (p = 0.001), 74.4 % (71.5–76.4), 58.7 % (56.3–61.1), and 0.654 (0.630–0.677) for non-enhanced T1WI, 62.1 % (60.1–64.2), 78.7 % (77.1–81), and 0.787 (0.771–0.810) for venous T1WI, and 66.4 % (64.8–50.9), 48.4 % (46–50.9), and 0.610 (0.586–0.626) for CECT, respectively.
The combination of T2WI with CECT enhanced diagnostic performance compared to T2WI, achieving sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 81.4 % (80–80.3), 78.1 % (75.9–80.2), and 0.911 (0.902–0.920) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The MRI radiomics outperformed the CT radiomics model to detect diagnosis of AP and the combination of MRI with CECT showed better performance than single models. The translation of radiomics into clinical practice may improve detection of AP, particularly MRI radiomics.
MRI与CT放射组学对急性胰腺炎的诊断价值
目的探讨CT和MRI放射组学在急性胰腺炎(AP)诊断中的单独和联合诊断价值。材料和方法我们前瞻性地纳入了2020年至2022年间诊断为AP的78例患者(平均年龄55.7 ± 17岁,男性48.7 %)。患者在出现症状48-72 h内行对比增强CT (CECT)检查,CECT后MRI≤ 24 h。由两名操作员对门静脉期(PVP) CECT图像、t2加权成像(WI) MR序列以及非增强和PVP T1-WI MR序列进行全胰腺三维人工分割。对照组(n = 77)胰腺正常。将数据集随机分为训练和测试两部分,比较不同的机器学习算法。进行受试者工作曲线分析。结果T2WI模型的诊断效果明显优于CECT、非增强和静脉T1WI,敏感性、特异性和AUC为73.3 %(95% % CI: % 71.5 - -74.7),80.1(78.2 - -83.2),和0.834 (0.819 - -0.844)T2WI (p = 0.001),74.4 %(71.5 - -76.4),58.7 %(56.3 - -61.1),和0.654 (0.630 - -0.677)non-enhanced T1WI, 62.1 %(60.1 - -64.2),78.7 % -81(77.1),和0.787(0.771 - -0.810)静脉T1WI,和66.4 %(64.8 - -50.9),48.4 %(46 - 50.9),和0.610(0.586 - -0.626),摄影,分别。与T2WI相比,T2WI联合CECT提高了诊断性能,达到了81.4 %(80-80.3)、78.1 %(75.9-80.2)和0.911 (0.902-0.920)(p = 0.001)的敏感性、特异性和AUC。结论MRI放射组学在诊断AP方面优于CT放射组学模型,且MRI与CECT联合应用优于单一模型。放射组学转化为临床实践可以提高AP的检测,特别是MRI放射组学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信