You asked, we listened: Examining accountability through actions and listening in corporate social advocacy

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Barbara Miller Gaither , Seoyeon Kim , Lucinda L. Austin
{"title":"You asked, we listened: Examining accountability through actions and listening in corporate social advocacy","authors":"Barbara Miller Gaither ,&nbsp;Seoyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Lucinda L. Austin","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this study was to examine corporate social advocacy (CSA) through the lens of stakeholder theory to explore how different CSA strategies may impact perceptions of accountability and stakeholder outcomes. A 2 (demonstrable action: present v. absent) x 2 (organizational listening: present v. absent) experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 636 U.S. adults. Results revealed that both demonstrable action and organizational listening had positive effects on CSA accountability (i.e., perceived intent and perceived transparency), and these measures of accountability led to positive attitudes and supportive intentions toward the company. The findings provide guidelines for how CSA can effectively demonstrate accountability to stakeholders – to move beyond talking-the-talk to actually being seen as walking-the-walk in regard to engagement on social-political issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 102536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124001152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine corporate social advocacy (CSA) through the lens of stakeholder theory to explore how different CSA strategies may impact perceptions of accountability and stakeholder outcomes. A 2 (demonstrable action: present v. absent) x 2 (organizational listening: present v. absent) experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 636 U.S. adults. Results revealed that both demonstrable action and organizational listening had positive effects on CSA accountability (i.e., perceived intent and perceived transparency), and these measures of accountability led to positive attitudes and supportive intentions toward the company. The findings provide guidelines for how CSA can effectively demonstrate accountability to stakeholders – to move beyond talking-the-talk to actually being seen as walking-the-walk in regard to engagement on social-political issues.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信