Acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injury: A 5-year review

Enrique Chávez-Serna, Kenzo Alejandro Fukumoto-Inukai, Ricardo Romero-Caballero, José Eduardo Telich-Tarriba, Elsa Natalia Haro-Álvarez, Damián Palafox, Alexander Cárdenas-Mejía
{"title":"Acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injury: A 5-year review","authors":"Enrique Chávez-Serna,&nbsp;Kenzo Alejandro Fukumoto-Inukai,&nbsp;Ricardo Romero-Caballero,&nbsp;José Eduardo Telich-Tarriba,&nbsp;Elsa Natalia Haro-Álvarez,&nbsp;Damián Palafox,&nbsp;Alexander Cárdenas-Mejía","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traumatic facial nerve injury is the second leading cause of facial paralysis, presenting significant challenges such as difficulties with eating, speaking, impaired vision, and loss of facial expression. Understanding these injuries is critical for plastic surgeons to optimize recovery and functional outcomes. This study examined our experience with acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injuries, focusing on their characteristics, the frequency of affected nerve branches, and identification using Seckel’s facial danger zones as anatomical landmarks. We also explored the implications of surgical management based on the current literature and our experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed 50 patients with acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injuries treated at Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González in Mexico City from January 2019 to January 2024. The collected data included demographics (age, sex, severity, and time to medical attention), injury mechanism, affected nerve branches using Seckel’s zones, and treatment methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of the patients were male (82%), with an average age of 29 ​± ​16 years. Sharp trauma from assault was the most common cause (66%). The buccal and frontal branches were most frequently affected, with Seckel zones IV and II involved in 46.86% and 33.33% of cases, respectively. Primary neurorrhaphy was performed in 96% of the patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The effective management of traumatic facial nerve injuries relies on understanding the characteristics of the injury and using anatomical landmarks for prompt localization. Primary neurorrhaphy is the preferred surgical approach, with nerve grafting being an alternative. Ideally, early intervention within 72 h is crucial for optimal nerve recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 161-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691124000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Traumatic facial nerve injury is the second leading cause of facial paralysis, presenting significant challenges such as difficulties with eating, speaking, impaired vision, and loss of facial expression. Understanding these injuries is critical for plastic surgeons to optimize recovery and functional outcomes. This study examined our experience with acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injuries, focusing on their characteristics, the frequency of affected nerve branches, and identification using Seckel’s facial danger zones as anatomical landmarks. We also explored the implications of surgical management based on the current literature and our experience.

Methods

We reviewed 50 patients with acute traumatic extratemporal facial nerve injuries treated at Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González in Mexico City from January 2019 to January 2024. The collected data included demographics (age, sex, severity, and time to medical attention), injury mechanism, affected nerve branches using Seckel’s zones, and treatment methods.

Results

The majority of the patients were male (82%), with an average age of 29 ​± ​16 years. Sharp trauma from assault was the most common cause (66%). The buccal and frontal branches were most frequently affected, with Seckel zones IV and II involved in 46.86% and 33.33% of cases, respectively. Primary neurorrhaphy was performed in 96% of the patients.

Conclusion

The effective management of traumatic facial nerve injuries relies on understanding the characteristics of the injury and using anatomical landmarks for prompt localization. Primary neurorrhaphy is the preferred surgical approach, with nerve grafting being an alternative. Ideally, early intervention within 72 h is crucial for optimal nerve recovery.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信