Schedule-based analysis of airborne transmission risk in public transportation systems

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Jiali Zhou , Haris N. Koutsopoulos
{"title":"Schedule-based analysis of airborne transmission risk in public transportation systems","authors":"Jiali Zhou ,&nbsp;Haris N. Koutsopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airborne diseases raise the question of transmission risk in public transportation systems. However, quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of transmission risk mitigation methods in public transportation is lacking. The paper develops an airborne transmission risk modeling framework based on the Wells-Riley model using as inputs transit operating characteristics, schedule, Origin-Destination (OD) demand, and virus characteristics. The model is sensitive to various factors that operators can control, and external factors that may be subject of broader policy decisions. The model is utilized to assess transmission risk as a function of OD flows, planned operations, and factors such as mask-wearing, ventilation, and infection rates. Using actual OD and AVL data from the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) Red Line, the paper explores the airborne transmission risk under different infection rate scenarios. The paper assesses the combined impact from viral load related factors and passenger load factors. Increasing frequency can mitigate risk, but cannot fully compensate for increases in infection rates. Imbalanced passenger distribution on different cars of a train increases the overall system-wide infection probability. Spatial infection rate patterns should also be considered during policymaking. For lines with branches, demand distribution among the branches is important and headway allocation adjustment can reduce risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airborne diseases raise the question of transmission risk in public transportation systems. However, quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of transmission risk mitigation methods in public transportation is lacking. The paper develops an airborne transmission risk modeling framework based on the Wells-Riley model using as inputs transit operating characteristics, schedule, Origin-Destination (OD) demand, and virus characteristics. The model is sensitive to various factors that operators can control, and external factors that may be subject of broader policy decisions. The model is utilized to assess transmission risk as a function of OD flows, planned operations, and factors such as mask-wearing, ventilation, and infection rates. Using actual OD and AVL data from the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) Red Line, the paper explores the airborne transmission risk under different infection rate scenarios. The paper assesses the combined impact from viral load related factors and passenger load factors. Increasing frequency can mitigate risk, but cannot fully compensate for increases in infection rates. Imbalanced passenger distribution on different cars of a train increases the overall system-wide infection probability. Spatial infection rate patterns should also be considered during policymaking. For lines with branches, demand distribution among the branches is important and headway allocation adjustment can reduce risk.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信