Richard Fuller , David Hanrahan , Victor Kabay , Ernesto Sanchez-Triana , Martin Kayser , Wilfred Lunga , Peter Bridgewater , Robert Watson
{"title":"Towards a prioritization screening framework for chemicals, wastes, and pollution","authors":"Richard Fuller , David Hanrahan , Victor Kabay , Ernesto Sanchez-Triana , Martin Kayser , Wilfred Lunga , Peter Bridgewater , Robert Watson","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With constrained resources and many issues at hand, various prioritization mechanisms will be needed to determine issues to be addressed for the upcoming Science Policy Panel (SPP) for chemicals, waste and pollution, currently mandated for development by the UN Environment Assembly. This proposed rapid review sets out one way to assist in prioritization. A screening of the current or expected impact - the actual harm caused to human health, biodiversity, food and water supply systems or economic cost - of the chemical or pollution issue can be made with a literature search and inputs from knowledgeable groups and experts. Issues reaching thresholds that indicate high impact can be recommended for assessment by the Panel. This approach is useful to highlight issues that may especially be of concern in low and middle-income countries, and is complementary to risk management methodologies of regulatory agencies in high-income countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103994"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With constrained resources and many issues at hand, various prioritization mechanisms will be needed to determine issues to be addressed for the upcoming Science Policy Panel (SPP) for chemicals, waste and pollution, currently mandated for development by the UN Environment Assembly. This proposed rapid review sets out one way to assist in prioritization. A screening of the current or expected impact - the actual harm caused to human health, biodiversity, food and water supply systems or economic cost - of the chemical or pollution issue can be made with a literature search and inputs from knowledgeable groups and experts. Issues reaching thresholds that indicate high impact can be recommended for assessment by the Panel. This approach is useful to highlight issues that may especially be of concern in low and middle-income countries, and is complementary to risk management methodologies of regulatory agencies in high-income countries.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.