Assessing to act: A water-energy-food-ecosystem (WEFE) nexus governance assessment for the Inkomati-Usuthu river basin in South Africa

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eva Sievers , Ingrid Canovas , Daniella Kristensen , Frank Hüesker
{"title":"Assessing to act: A water-energy-food-ecosystem (WEFE) nexus governance assessment for the Inkomati-Usuthu river basin in South Africa","authors":"Eva Sievers ,&nbsp;Ingrid Canovas ,&nbsp;Daniella Kristensen ,&nbsp;Frank Hüesker","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water, energy, food, and ecosystems (WEFE) are inherently interlinked, forming a complex system (nexus) that is shaped by natural and anthropogenic factors. The nexus concept was introduced as a holistic approach to resource governance. Yet, many studies remain rather technical and governance and policy-related questions often unanswered. This paper presents a WEFE nexus governance assessment for the Inkomati-Usuthu river basin in South Africa. The assessment is based on interviews and workshops with stakeholders from the four WEFE sectors and local, regional and national levels. Using the WEFE nexus governance assessment tool NXGAT, we evaluated the current governance system along five governance dimensions (<em>actors and networks, levels and scales, problem perspectives and goal ambitions, strategies and instruments, and responsibilities and resources</em>) and five governance quality criteria (<em>comprehensiveness, coherence, flexibility, intensity of action, and fit</em>). Our results show that the current governance system of the Inkomati-Usuthu river basin is <em>moderately restrictive</em> towards WEFE nexus governance, in particular due to the poor performance of the governance quality criteria <em>comprehensiveness, coherence</em>, and <em>intensity of action</em>. We give practical recommendations for nexus-oriented actions that can be implemented as key steps towards WEFE nexus governance. Subsequently, we reflect on our methods and discuss limitations of our study. We conclude that a WEFE nexus governance assessment based on stakeholder experiences and knowledge provides valuable insights and contributes to broader efforts to enable more contextualised assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103986"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water, energy, food, and ecosystems (WEFE) are inherently interlinked, forming a complex system (nexus) that is shaped by natural and anthropogenic factors. The nexus concept was introduced as a holistic approach to resource governance. Yet, many studies remain rather technical and governance and policy-related questions often unanswered. This paper presents a WEFE nexus governance assessment for the Inkomati-Usuthu river basin in South Africa. The assessment is based on interviews and workshops with stakeholders from the four WEFE sectors and local, regional and national levels. Using the WEFE nexus governance assessment tool NXGAT, we evaluated the current governance system along five governance dimensions (actors and networks, levels and scales, problem perspectives and goal ambitions, strategies and instruments, and responsibilities and resources) and five governance quality criteria (comprehensiveness, coherence, flexibility, intensity of action, and fit). Our results show that the current governance system of the Inkomati-Usuthu river basin is moderately restrictive towards WEFE nexus governance, in particular due to the poor performance of the governance quality criteria comprehensiveness, coherence, and intensity of action. We give practical recommendations for nexus-oriented actions that can be implemented as key steps towards WEFE nexus governance. Subsequently, we reflect on our methods and discuss limitations of our study. We conclude that a WEFE nexus governance assessment based on stakeholder experiences and knowledge provides valuable insights and contributes to broader efforts to enable more contextualised assessments.
评估行动:南非因科马蒂-乌苏图河流域的水-能源-食物-生态系统(WEFE)关系治理评估
水、能源、食物和生态系统(WEFE)内在地相互联系,形成了一个由自然和人为因素形成的复杂系统(nexus)。nexus概念是作为资源治理的整体方法引入的。然而,许多研究仍然相当技术性,与治理和政策相关的问题往往没有答案。本文提出了WEFE对南非Inkomati-Usuthu河流域的nexus治理评估。评估是基于对四个经济经济部门以及地方、区域和国家各级利益攸关方的访谈和讲习班。使用WEFE nexus治理评估工具NXGAT,我们根据五个治理维度(参与者和网络、水平和规模、问题视角和目标抱负、战略和工具、责任和资源)和五个治理质量标准(全面性、一致性、灵活性、行动强度和适合性)评估了当前的治理体系。我们的研究结果表明,英科马蒂-乌苏图河流域目前的治理体系对WEFE关系治理存在适度限制,特别是由于治理质量标准的全面性、一致性和行动强度表现不佳。我们就面向联系的行动提出了切实可行的建议,这些建议可以作为实现世界经济论坛联系治理的关键步骤加以实施。随后,我们对我们的研究方法进行了反思,并讨论了我们研究的局限性。我们的结论是,基于利益相关者经验和知识的WEFE联系治理评估提供了有价值的见解,并有助于更广泛的努力,以实现更多的情境化评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信