Transformative change from below? Linking biodiversity governance with the diversity of bottom-up action

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Helena Valve , Dalia D'Amato , Aniek Hebinck , Anita Lazurko , Mara de Pater , Romana Jungwirth Březovská , Heli Saarikoski , Chrysi Laspidou , Hans Keune , Konstantinos Ziliaskopoulos , Zuzana Veronika Harmáčková
{"title":"Transformative change from below? Linking biodiversity governance with the diversity of bottom-up action","authors":"Helena Valve ,&nbsp;Dalia D'Amato ,&nbsp;Aniek Hebinck ,&nbsp;Anita Lazurko ,&nbsp;Mara de Pater ,&nbsp;Romana Jungwirth Březovská ,&nbsp;Heli Saarikoski ,&nbsp;Chrysi Laspidou ,&nbsp;Hans Keune ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Ziliaskopoulos ,&nbsp;Zuzana Veronika Harmáčková","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individual actors and actor groups are vital catalysts of transformative change as they are able to initiate interventions that nurture and protect biodiversity. This paper analyses biodiversity-focused practices across the civil, market and public spheres to identify the modes of intervention that actors in Europe utilise when they seek to fight biodiversity loss as part of their every-day work or voluntary activism. Studying how actors locate and engage with biodiversity issues allowed us to develop a typology of intervention modes and to unravel interlinkages between biodiversity governance and bottom-up action in a new manner. The seven modes of intervention identified from the rich qualitative data demonstrate how bottom-up practices vary in terms of the tangible issues they seek to address. Practitioners and activists locate options for change in resource management practices, production and consumption systems, market conditions, and land-use, amongst others. The findings enact a Europe in which cohesion policies, land-use pressures and power lobbies controlling resource management generate resistance and spark innovation. The aspirations to affect policymaking and biodiversity governance vary from one mode to another. In some cases, governance is positioned as a target of bottom-up action. Governance can also be assigned an action-conditioning role or regarded as a critical part of the assemblage that can generate transformative change. The typology also grants visibility to potentially unrecognised modes and mediations along which transformative change is and might be further catalysed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individual actors and actor groups are vital catalysts of transformative change as they are able to initiate interventions that nurture and protect biodiversity. This paper analyses biodiversity-focused practices across the civil, market and public spheres to identify the modes of intervention that actors in Europe utilise when they seek to fight biodiversity loss as part of their every-day work or voluntary activism. Studying how actors locate and engage with biodiversity issues allowed us to develop a typology of intervention modes and to unravel interlinkages between biodiversity governance and bottom-up action in a new manner. The seven modes of intervention identified from the rich qualitative data demonstrate how bottom-up practices vary in terms of the tangible issues they seek to address. Practitioners and activists locate options for change in resource management practices, production and consumption systems, market conditions, and land-use, amongst others. The findings enact a Europe in which cohesion policies, land-use pressures and power lobbies controlling resource management generate resistance and spark innovation. The aspirations to affect policymaking and biodiversity governance vary from one mode to another. In some cases, governance is positioned as a target of bottom-up action. Governance can also be assigned an action-conditioning role or regarded as a critical part of the assemblage that can generate transformative change. The typology also grants visibility to potentially unrecognised modes and mediations along which transformative change is and might be further catalysed.
自下而上的变革?将生物多样性治理与自下而上行动的多样性联系起来
个体行为者和行为者群体是变革性变革的重要催化剂,因为他们能够发起培育和保护生物多样性的干预措施。本文分析了民间、市场和公共领域以生物多样性为重点的实践,以确定欧洲行动者在寻求将对抗生物多样性丧失作为其日常工作或自愿行动主义的一部分时使用的干预模式。研究参与者如何定位和参与生物多样性问题,使我们能够开发干预模式的类型学,并以一种新的方式揭示生物多样性治理与自下而上行动之间的相互联系。从丰富的定性数据中确定的七种干预模式表明,自下而上的实践在寻求解决的具体问题方面是如何变化的。从业者和活动家在资源管理实践、生产和消费系统、市场条件和土地使用等方面找到了改变的选择。研究结果表明,在欧洲,凝聚力政策、土地使用压力和控制资源管理的权力游说集团会产生阻力,并激发创新。影响政策制定和生物多样性治理的愿望因模式而异。在某些情况下,治理被定位为自底向上行动的目标。治理也可以被赋予一个行动调节的角色,或者被视为能够产生变革性变化的组合的关键部分。该类型学还为潜在的未被识别的模式和媒介提供了可见性,这些模式和媒介正在并可能进一步催化变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信