Identifying leverage points for sustainable transitions in urban – rural systems: Application of graph theory to participatory causal loop diagramming

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anton Rozhkov , Moira Zellner , John T. Murphy , Dean Massey
{"title":"Identifying leverage points for sustainable transitions in urban – rural systems: Application of graph theory to participatory causal loop diagramming","authors":"Anton Rozhkov ,&nbsp;Moira Zellner ,&nbsp;John T. Murphy ,&nbsp;Dean Massey","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Socio-ecological systems are vital for integrated urban and rural environments. Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) help identify system connections and future planning and policy interventions. This article applies graph theory to the assessment of a CLD of the Food – Energy – Water nexus in integrated urban – rural regions, drawn within a participatory modeling effort with domain experts. We applied well-known measures and developed a new method that considers the loop-based structure of the system. The loop-based structure complements well-established node- and network-based metrics by identifying hidden leverage points that may play a crucial role in disseminating systemic change. Our multi-method approach allows us to identify the most transformative lever points, distinguishing between initiators (e.g., non-commodity local food products, urbanization, and local budgets) from reinforcers of change capable of cementing these transitions by bridging across the system (e.g., climate activism, recreational space, and water pollution). Our analysis confirms some insights derived through the conversations shaping and shaped by the collaborative causal loop diagramming. With our approach, we also find that some policies, while popular in the literature and professional circles, may not be transformative due to their location within the interconnected system. Our approach thus strengthens the contribution of participatory CLD processes to complex problem-solving and policy design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103996"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socio-ecological systems are vital for integrated urban and rural environments. Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) help identify system connections and future planning and policy interventions. This article applies graph theory to the assessment of a CLD of the Food – Energy – Water nexus in integrated urban – rural regions, drawn within a participatory modeling effort with domain experts. We applied well-known measures and developed a new method that considers the loop-based structure of the system. The loop-based structure complements well-established node- and network-based metrics by identifying hidden leverage points that may play a crucial role in disseminating systemic change. Our multi-method approach allows us to identify the most transformative lever points, distinguishing between initiators (e.g., non-commodity local food products, urbanization, and local budgets) from reinforcers of change capable of cementing these transitions by bridging across the system (e.g., climate activism, recreational space, and water pollution). Our analysis confirms some insights derived through the conversations shaping and shaped by the collaborative causal loop diagramming. With our approach, we also find that some policies, while popular in the literature and professional circles, may not be transformative due to their location within the interconnected system. Our approach thus strengthens the contribution of participatory CLD processes to complex problem-solving and policy design.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信