Proton-Photon Comparative Planning for Pediatric CNS Tumors: First Experiences of the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
H. Schievenin , R. Crain , S. Penfold , M. Penfold , P. Gorayski , E. Shierlaw , A. Santos , F. Saran
{"title":"Proton-Photon Comparative Planning for Pediatric CNS Tumors: First Experiences of the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research","authors":"H. Schievenin ,&nbsp;R. Crain ,&nbsp;S. Penfold ,&nbsp;M. Penfold ,&nbsp;P. Gorayski ,&nbsp;E. Shierlaw ,&nbsp;A. Santos ,&nbsp;F. Saran","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate mean dose between focal proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon-based radiotherapy (XRT) using comparative planning in paediatric patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2022 and June 2023, 23 patients were referred to the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research (ABCPTR) for comparative planning to be evaluated for consideration of focal PBT. Nineteen patients were from Australia and four from New Zealand. Eighteen patients proceeded with comparative planning based on locally defined target volumes and planning constraints. All calculated plans underwent prospective analysis of quality metrics, including target volume coverage, integral dose, and dose(s) to organs at risk (OAR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comparable target volume metrics were achieved between PBT and XRT. PBT achieved a mean reduction in integral dose of 30.2% (range 15.0 – 54.0%) in all cases. Further, dose to most OAR favoured PBT. Notable areas of dose reduction to OARs were most commonly seen in the right optic nerve, right lens, right globe, left temporal lobe and left cochlea. Hippocampi were equally receiving lower mean doses when compared to XRT unless directly adjacent to the clinical and planning target volumes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this cohort, dosimetric advantages were identified using PBT when compared to XRT with respect to reduction in integral dose and OAR. This relative reduction in integral dose may translate into a reduced risk of second malignancies when compared with XRT and reduced mean doses to OAR have the potential to improve quality of survivorship. PBT should be considered the standard of care in Australian paediatric patients with CNS tumours requiring focal irradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 3","pages":"Page e13"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624036216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate mean dose between focal proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon-based radiotherapy (XRT) using comparative planning in paediatric patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours.

Methods

Between January 2022 and June 2023, 23 patients were referred to the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research (ABCPTR) for comparative planning to be evaluated for consideration of focal PBT. Nineteen patients were from Australia and four from New Zealand. Eighteen patients proceeded with comparative planning based on locally defined target volumes and planning constraints. All calculated plans underwent prospective analysis of quality metrics, including target volume coverage, integral dose, and dose(s) to organs at risk (OAR).

Results

Comparable target volume metrics were achieved between PBT and XRT. PBT achieved a mean reduction in integral dose of 30.2% (range 15.0 – 54.0%) in all cases. Further, dose to most OAR favoured PBT. Notable areas of dose reduction to OARs were most commonly seen in the right optic nerve, right lens, right globe, left temporal lobe and left cochlea. Hippocampi were equally receiving lower mean doses when compared to XRT unless directly adjacent to the clinical and planning target volumes.

Conclusion

In this cohort, dosimetric advantages were identified using PBT when compared to XRT with respect to reduction in integral dose and OAR. This relative reduction in integral dose may translate into a reduced risk of second malignancies when compared with XRT and reduced mean doses to OAR have the potential to improve quality of survivorship. PBT should be considered the standard of care in Australian paediatric patients with CNS tumours requiring focal irradiation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信