H. Schievenin , R. Crain , S. Penfold , M. Penfold , P. Gorayski , E. Shierlaw , A. Santos , F. Saran
{"title":"Proton-Photon Comparative Planning for Pediatric CNS Tumors: First Experiences of the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research","authors":"H. Schievenin , R. Crain , S. Penfold , M. Penfold , P. Gorayski , E. Shierlaw , A. Santos , F. Saran","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate mean dose between focal proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon-based radiotherapy (XRT) using comparative planning in paediatric patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2022 and June 2023, 23 patients were referred to the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research (ABCPTR) for comparative planning to be evaluated for consideration of focal PBT. Nineteen patients were from Australia and four from New Zealand. Eighteen patients proceeded with comparative planning based on locally defined target volumes and planning constraints. All calculated plans underwent prospective analysis of quality metrics, including target volume coverage, integral dose, and dose(s) to organs at risk (OAR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comparable target volume metrics were achieved between PBT and XRT. PBT achieved a mean reduction in integral dose of 30.2% (range 15.0 – 54.0%) in all cases. Further, dose to most OAR favoured PBT. Notable areas of dose reduction to OARs were most commonly seen in the right optic nerve, right lens, right globe, left temporal lobe and left cochlea. Hippocampi were equally receiving lower mean doses when compared to XRT unless directly adjacent to the clinical and planning target volumes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this cohort, dosimetric advantages were identified using PBT when compared to XRT with respect to reduction in integral dose and OAR. This relative reduction in integral dose may translate into a reduced risk of second malignancies when compared with XRT and reduced mean doses to OAR have the potential to improve quality of survivorship. PBT should be considered the standard of care in Australian paediatric patients with CNS tumours requiring focal irradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 3","pages":"Page e13"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624036216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate mean dose between focal proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon-based radiotherapy (XRT) using comparative planning in paediatric patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours.
Methods
Between January 2022 and June 2023, 23 patients were referred to the Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research (ABCPTR) for comparative planning to be evaluated for consideration of focal PBT. Nineteen patients were from Australia and four from New Zealand. Eighteen patients proceeded with comparative planning based on locally defined target volumes and planning constraints. All calculated plans underwent prospective analysis of quality metrics, including target volume coverage, integral dose, and dose(s) to organs at risk (OAR).
Results
Comparable target volume metrics were achieved between PBT and XRT. PBT achieved a mean reduction in integral dose of 30.2% (range 15.0 – 54.0%) in all cases. Further, dose to most OAR favoured PBT. Notable areas of dose reduction to OARs were most commonly seen in the right optic nerve, right lens, right globe, left temporal lobe and left cochlea. Hippocampi were equally receiving lower mean doses when compared to XRT unless directly adjacent to the clinical and planning target volumes.
Conclusion
In this cohort, dosimetric advantages were identified using PBT when compared to XRT with respect to reduction in integral dose and OAR. This relative reduction in integral dose may translate into a reduced risk of second malignancies when compared with XRT and reduced mean doses to OAR have the potential to improve quality of survivorship. PBT should be considered the standard of care in Australian paediatric patients with CNS tumours requiring focal irradiation.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.