Why are ecologically sensitive areas (ESAs) in African cities encroached on? Unveiling the encroachers' outlook

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Owusu Amponsah , Otiwaa Boakye , Jacob Nchagmado Tagnan , Gideon Abagna Azunre , Foster Frempong , Stephen Appiah Takyi , Michael Ayertey Nanor
{"title":"Why are ecologically sensitive areas (ESAs) in African cities encroached on? Unveiling the encroachers' outlook","authors":"Owusu Amponsah ,&nbsp;Otiwaa Boakye ,&nbsp;Jacob Nchagmado Tagnan ,&nbsp;Gideon Abagna Azunre ,&nbsp;Foster Frempong ,&nbsp;Stephen Appiah Takyi ,&nbsp;Michael Ayertey Nanor","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecologically sensitive areas (ESAs) support the sustainability of cities worldwide. Nevertheless, their encroachment by grey land uses in cities, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), has led to their sturdy deterioration. The current study assessed encroachers' appreciation of the utility of ESAs towards unpacking their motivation to encroach on these spaces. This has received limited scholarly attention. The study empirically focused on Kumasi, a rapidly urbanising city in Ghana, and adopted the convergent parallel mixed-method design to gather and analyse data. The results indicate that the encroachment phenomenon is not monolithic. Generally, encroachers were more aware of ESAs' provisioning and cultural functions than their regulating and ecosystem services. The results further revealed that urbanisation, the dual system of urban land management, and individuals' ignorance of the importance of ESAs were the main factors that contributed to the overall depletion of ESAs. The study found evidence of both ‘<em>bold</em>’ and ‘<em>quiet</em>’ encroachment where, on the one hand, some actors (particularly property developers) courageously encroached and consolidated their gains via political maneuvers, while on the other hand, ‘ordinary’ individuals incrementally and silently encroached due to limited housing and economical options. The paper concludes by recommending that policies and regulations designed to manage ESAs should move away from a brutal and violent enforcement approach to critically consider the perspective of encroachers. One critical strategy is to educate encroachers to enhance both their awareness and knowledge of the importance of ESAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105761"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecologically sensitive areas (ESAs) support the sustainability of cities worldwide. Nevertheless, their encroachment by grey land uses in cities, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), has led to their sturdy deterioration. The current study assessed encroachers' appreciation of the utility of ESAs towards unpacking their motivation to encroach on these spaces. This has received limited scholarly attention. The study empirically focused on Kumasi, a rapidly urbanising city in Ghana, and adopted the convergent parallel mixed-method design to gather and analyse data. The results indicate that the encroachment phenomenon is not monolithic. Generally, encroachers were more aware of ESAs' provisioning and cultural functions than their regulating and ecosystem services. The results further revealed that urbanisation, the dual system of urban land management, and individuals' ignorance of the importance of ESAs were the main factors that contributed to the overall depletion of ESAs. The study found evidence of both ‘bold’ and ‘quiet’ encroachment where, on the one hand, some actors (particularly property developers) courageously encroached and consolidated their gains via political maneuvers, while on the other hand, ‘ordinary’ individuals incrementally and silently encroached due to limited housing and economical options. The paper concludes by recommending that policies and regulations designed to manage ESAs should move away from a brutal and violent enforcement approach to critically consider the perspective of encroachers. One critical strategy is to educate encroachers to enhance both their awareness and knowledge of the importance of ESAs.
为什么非洲城市的生态敏感区(esa)受到侵犯?揭露入侵者的面貌
生态敏感区(esa)支持全球城市的可持续发展。然而,城市中灰色土地的使用,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA),导致了它们的严重恶化。目前的研究评估了入侵者对esa在揭示他们入侵这些空间的动机方面的效用的欣赏。这得到了有限的学术关注。本研究以加纳快速城市化城市库马西为实证研究对象,采用融合并行混合方法设计数据收集与分析。结果表明,这种侵蚀现象并不是单一的。总体而言,入侵者更重视esa的供给和文化功能,而不是它们的调节和生态系统服务。城市化、二元土地管理体制和个体对生态用地重要性的忽视是导致生态用地总体枯竭的主要因素。该研究发现了“大胆”和“安静”侵占的证据,一方面,一些行为者(尤其是房地产开发商)通过政治手段大胆地侵占并巩固了他们的收益,而另一方面,“普通”个人由于住房和经济选择有限而逐渐和无声地侵占。论文最后建议,旨在管理生态环境的政策和法规应该从野蛮和暴力的执法方法转向批判性地考虑入侵者的观点。一个关键的策略是教育入侵者提高他们对环境安全评价重要性的认识和知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信