Dolor y catastrofismo en el síndrome del túnel del carpo

Q4 Health Professions
O. del Pozo Blanco , E. González García
{"title":"Dolor y catastrofismo en el síndrome del túnel del carpo","authors":"O. del Pozo Blanco ,&nbsp;E. González García","doi":"10.1016/j.ft.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine which variable influences pain in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), specifically whether it is the severity of nerve injury or pain-associated catastrophization (PC). Additionally, to assess the relationship between electromyography (EMG) results and perceived pain in both hands.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A prospective observational study of CTS patients with EMG results, who completed two questionnaires: the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) to quantify PC, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess pain. For the latter, only the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used due to the difficulty patients faced in selecting the most appropriate term.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 74 subjects with CTS were studied. The intensity of pain and the severity of median nerve injury were not statistically significant in the right hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.925) or the left hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.270). A positive association was found between the PCS and pain in the right hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.011) and in the left hand (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.050). The relationship of the results between both hands was statistically significant for both EMG (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and pain (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pain in CTS is determined by PC rather than the severity of nerve injury. There is similarity in pain perception and the degree of median nerve injury between both hands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34994,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S021156382400258X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine which variable influences pain in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), specifically whether it is the severity of nerve injury or pain-associated catastrophization (PC). Additionally, to assess the relationship between electromyography (EMG) results and perceived pain in both hands.

Method

A prospective observational study of CTS patients with EMG results, who completed two questionnaires: the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) to quantify PC, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to assess pain. For the latter, only the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used due to the difficulty patients faced in selecting the most appropriate term.

Results

A total of 74 subjects with CTS were studied. The intensity of pain and the severity of median nerve injury were not statistically significant in the right hand (p = 0.925) or the left hand (p = 0.270). A positive association was found between the PCS and pain in the right hand (p = 0.011) and in the left hand (p = 0.050). The relationship of the results between both hands was statistically significant for both EMG (p = 0.001) and pain (p = 0.000).

Conclusions

Pain in CTS is determined by PC rather than the severity of nerve injury. There is similarity in pain perception and the degree of median nerve injury between both hands.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisioterapia
Fisioterapia Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Fisioterapeutas. Sus páginas ofrecen desde artículos originales hasta revisiones, pasando por el estudio de casos o los actos más importantes relacionados con la especialidad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信