Individual differences and 11-year longitudinal changes in older adults’ prospective memory: A comparison with episodic memory, working memory, processing speed, and verbal knowledge

IF 2.9 1区 心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Sascha Zuber , Matthias Kliegel , Vera Schumacher , Mike Martin , Paolo Ghisletta , Sebastian Horn
{"title":"Individual differences and 11-year longitudinal changes in older adults’ prospective memory: A comparison with episodic memory, working memory, processing speed, and verbal knowledge","authors":"Sascha Zuber ,&nbsp;Matthias Kliegel ,&nbsp;Vera Schumacher ,&nbsp;Mike Martin ,&nbsp;Paolo Ghisletta ,&nbsp;Sebastian Horn","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2024.104602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prospective Memory (PM; remembering intended actions after a delay) represents a core ability contributing to everyday functioning and independence in older adulthood. Despite its high relevance for successful aging, the understanding of individual differences in level and within-person change of PM in older adulthood is currently limited. Using longitudinal data from initially 364 older adults (between 65 and 80 years of age at wave 1; 46 % female) across four waves of the Zurich Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging, we examined (a) individual differences and (b) longitudinal change in PM performance over up to 11 years, (c) compared differences and change in PM with other central variables of cognitive functioning (episodic memory, working memory, processing speed, verbal knowledge), and (d) explored the effect of key sociodemographic variables (education, income, sex, health) on PM. Linear mixed modeling with Bayesian estimation indicated substantial individual differences in cognitive performance, with by far the highest variability in PM. Longitudinal age-related decreases were largest for working memory and cognitive speed, relatively small for PM, while verbal knowledge remained stable. Individual differences in age-related changes in performance were only observed for processing speed and verbal knowledge, but not for PM. This pattern remained after considering various cognitive and sociodemographic covariates. This is the first longitudinal study of PM that allows an in-depth examination of individual differences in both level and change in PM with comparison to other key cognitive abilities across older adulthood. The findings highlight the complex interplay between cognitive abilities, individual differences, and development across older adulthood, with implications for understanding cognitive aging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of memory and language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X24001050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prospective Memory (PM; remembering intended actions after a delay) represents a core ability contributing to everyday functioning and independence in older adulthood. Despite its high relevance for successful aging, the understanding of individual differences in level and within-person change of PM in older adulthood is currently limited. Using longitudinal data from initially 364 older adults (between 65 and 80 years of age at wave 1; 46 % female) across four waves of the Zurich Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging, we examined (a) individual differences and (b) longitudinal change in PM performance over up to 11 years, (c) compared differences and change in PM with other central variables of cognitive functioning (episodic memory, working memory, processing speed, verbal knowledge), and (d) explored the effect of key sociodemographic variables (education, income, sex, health) on PM. Linear mixed modeling with Bayesian estimation indicated substantial individual differences in cognitive performance, with by far the highest variability in PM. Longitudinal age-related decreases were largest for working memory and cognitive speed, relatively small for PM, while verbal knowledge remained stable. Individual differences in age-related changes in performance were only observed for processing speed and verbal knowledge, but not for PM. This pattern remained after considering various cognitive and sociodemographic covariates. This is the first longitudinal study of PM that allows an in-depth examination of individual differences in both level and change in PM with comparison to other key cognitive abilities across older adulthood. The findings highlight the complex interplay between cognitive abilities, individual differences, and development across older adulthood, with implications for understanding cognitive aging.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12.7 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in the Journal of Memory and Language contribute to the formulation of scientific issues and theories in the areas of memory, language comprehension and production, and cognitive processes. Special emphasis is given to research articles that provide new theoretical insights based on a carefully laid empirical foundation. The journal generally favors articles that provide multiple experiments. In addition, significant theoretical papers without new experimental findings may be published. The Journal of Memory and Language is a valuable tool for cognitive scientists, including psychologists, linguists, and others interested in memory and learning, language, reading, and speech. Research Areas include: • Topics that illuminate aspects of memory or language processing • Linguistics • Neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信