Infection alters foraging decisions in a common songbird

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Francis E. Tillman Jr., James S. Adelman
{"title":"Infection alters foraging decisions in a common songbird","authors":"Francis E. Tillman Jr.,&nbsp;James S. Adelman","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effect(s) of infection on optimal foraging decisions are largely unknown but have important implications for pathogen spread, especially when individuals congregate at or near food resources. House finches, <em>Haeomorhous mexicanus</em>, are ubiquitous group foragers whose visits to bird feeders facilitate the spread of <em>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</em>, which can cause severe conjunctivitis, temporary functional blindness and pronounced sickness behaviours. We placed single, wild-caught house finches in novel arenas containing a high-quality food source (sunflower seeds) and either a medium-quality (Roudybush crumble) or low-quality (5% sunflower, 95% rice hulls) food source. At one time point before infection and one time point during infection, we recorded each bird's latency to first visit each food source, number of unique feeding visits to each food source, total time spent feeding at each food source and the amount of each food source eaten. When presented with high- versus medium-quality food sources, healthy finches preferred high-quality food in terms of latency to first visit, time spent at the source and amount eaten. During infection, these preferences were lost or muted in all those metrics. When given a choice between high- and low-quality food sources, healthy birds still preferred the high-quality option, but, unlike with the medium-quality choice, this preference persisted during infection. These results suggest that finches' foraging decisions change based on infection status and available food choices. Such differences could mitigate contact rates and, therefore, pathogen transmission between healthy and sick individuals when food resources cause animal aggregation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 123023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224003257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect(s) of infection on optimal foraging decisions are largely unknown but have important implications for pathogen spread, especially when individuals congregate at or near food resources. House finches, Haeomorhous mexicanus, are ubiquitous group foragers whose visits to bird feeders facilitate the spread of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, which can cause severe conjunctivitis, temporary functional blindness and pronounced sickness behaviours. We placed single, wild-caught house finches in novel arenas containing a high-quality food source (sunflower seeds) and either a medium-quality (Roudybush crumble) or low-quality (5% sunflower, 95% rice hulls) food source. At one time point before infection and one time point during infection, we recorded each bird's latency to first visit each food source, number of unique feeding visits to each food source, total time spent feeding at each food source and the amount of each food source eaten. When presented with high- versus medium-quality food sources, healthy finches preferred high-quality food in terms of latency to first visit, time spent at the source and amount eaten. During infection, these preferences were lost or muted in all those metrics. When given a choice between high- and low-quality food sources, healthy birds still preferred the high-quality option, but, unlike with the medium-quality choice, this preference persisted during infection. These results suggest that finches' foraging decisions change based on infection status and available food choices. Such differences could mitigate contact rates and, therefore, pathogen transmission between healthy and sick individuals when food resources cause animal aggregation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信